Literature DB >> 16670445

A new proposed simplified classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and bifurcation interventional techniques.

Mohammad-Reza Movahed1, Curtiss T Stinis.   

Abstract

Current classification systems of coronary bifurcation lesions are confusing and difficult to memorize. As coronary revascularization techniques become increasingly complex, it is important to establish a universal classification system. This manuscript proposes a simplified classification system that uses a combination of letters and numbers to provide a clinically relevant anatomic description of a given coronary artery bifurcation lesion. This classification consists of the prefix B (for Bifurcation lesion), followed by the addition of 4 separate suffixes. The first suffix consists of one of the letters C, N, S, or L. C = Close to the bifurcation: the lesion is close to a bifurcation, but the distance from the carina is more than the width of the plaque protruding into the lumen; N = Bifurcation lesion with one branch being Nonsignificant: nonsignificant being defined as less than 2.0 mm vessel diameter; S = Small proximal segment; or L = Large proximal segment: large defined as more than two-thirds of the sum of the diameters of both branch vessels. The second suffix describes the number of diseased ostia. 1M = only the Main vessel ostium is involved; 1S = only the Side branch ostium is involved; or 2 = both ostia are involved. The third suffix classifies the angle between the bifurcation vessels and uses the letters V or T; V = the angle between the two branches is less than 70 degrees, T = angle more than 70 degrees. The fourth suffixes are optional: CA for calcified, LM for left main involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16670445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  5 in total

1.  New strategies in the treatment of coronary bifurcations.

Authors:  I Iakovou; N Foin; A Andreou; N Viceconte; C Di Mario
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Recent perspective on coronary artery bifurcation interventions.

Authors:  Debabrata Dash
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2014-02-14

3.  Stability and bioactivity of pepCD47 attachment on stainless steel surfaces.

Authors:  Vaishali V Inamdar; Emmett Fitzpatrick; Ivan Alferiev; Chandrasekaran Nagaswami; Lynn A Spruce; Hossein Fazelinia; George Bratinov; Steven H Seeholzer; Robert J Levy; Ilia Fishbein; Stanley J Stachelek
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Treating In-Stent Restenosis in Unprotected-Left Main: LM-DRAGON-Registry.

Authors:  Wojciech Wańha; Jacek Bil; Michalina Kołodziejczak; Adam Kowalówka; Mariusz Kowalewski; Damian Hudziak; Radosław Gocoł; Rafał Januszek; Tomasz Figatowski; Marek Milewski; Brunon Tomasiewicz; Piotr Kübler; Bruno Hrymniak; Piotr Desperak; Łukasz Kuźma; Krzysztof Milewski; Bartłomiej Góra; Andrzej Łoś; Jan Kulczycki; Adrian Włodarczak; Wojciech Skorupski; Marek Grygier; Maciej Lesiak; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Marek Andres; Paweł Kleczynski; Radosław Litwinowicz; Andrea Borin; Grzegorz Smolka; Krzysztof Reczuch; Marcin Gruchała; Robert J Gil; Miłosz Jaguszewski; Krzysztof Bartuś; Piotr Suwalski; Sławomir Dobrzycki; Dariusz Dudek; Stanisław Bartuś; Mariusz Ga Sior; Andrzej Ochała; Alexandra J Lansky; Marek Deja; Jacek Legutko; Elvin Kedhi; Wojciech Wojakowski
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-29

5.  A randomised comparison of Conventional versus Intentional straTegy in patients with high Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion: rationale and design of the CIT-RESOLVE trial.

Authors:  Dong Zhang; Dong Yin; Chenxi Song; Chengang Zhu; Ajay J Kirtane; Bo Xu; Kefei Dou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.