Literature DB >> 16670138

Informed consent for research and authorization under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule: an integrated approach.

David Shalowitz1, David Wendler.   

Abstract

Researchers have found that implementation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule is having a negative impact on clinical research. This impact traces, in part, to many research institutions complying with HIPAA by adding lengthy, complex language to their research consent documents. The addition of extensive language burdens institutional review boards and may undermine participants' understanding of the research in which they take part. Comparative analysis reveals, however, that the addition of lengthy text often is unnecessary. The U.S. federal requirements for informed consent for human subjects research and the HIPAA Privacy Rule's requirements for individual authorization overlap substantially. Hence, consent forms that satisfy the U.S. federal regulations for human subjects research need only minimal additional text to also satisfy the authorization requirements under the HIPAA Privacy Rule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16670138     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-9-200605020-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  5 in total

1.  The impact of HIPAA authorization on willingness to participate in clinical research.

Authors:  Anne L Dunlop; Tracie Graham; Zanie Leroy; Karen Glanz; Boadie Dunlop
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public?

Authors:  Donald J Willison; Lisa Schwartz; Julia Abelson; Cathy Charles; Marilyn Swinton; David Northrup; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  A globally optimal k-anonymity method for the de-identification of health data.

Authors:  Khaled El Emam; Fida Kamal Dankar; Romeo Issa; Elizabeth Jonker; Daniel Amyot; Elise Cogo; Jean-Pierre Corriveau; Mark Walker; Sadrul Chowdhury; Regis Vaillancourt; Tyson Roffey; Jim Bottomley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Patient reactions to confidentiality, liability, and financial aspects of informed consent in cardiology research.

Authors:  Alice K Fortune-Greeley; N Chantelle Hardy; Li Lin; Joëlle Y Friedman; Janice S Lawlor; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Mark A Hall; Kevin A Schulman; Jeremy Sugarman; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-01-12

5.  Preconsent education about research processes improved African Americans' willingness to participate in clinical research.

Authors:  Anne L Dunlop; Zanie C Leroy; Kristi M Logue; Karen Glanz; Boadie W Dunlop
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 6.437

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.