Literature DB >> 16670133

Regional variations in health care intensity and physician perceptions of quality of care.

Brenda E Sirovich1, Daniel J Gottlieb, H Gilbert Welch, Elliott S Fisher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research has documented dramatic differences in health care utilization and spending across U.S. regions with similar levels of patient illness. Although patient outcomes and quality of care have been found to be no better in regions of high health care intensity, it is unknown whether physicians in these regions feel more capable of providing good patient care than those in low-intensity regions.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether physicians in high-intensity regions feel better able to care for patients than physicians in low-intensity regions.
DESIGN: Physician telephone survey.
SETTING: 51 metropolitan and 9 nonmetropolitan areas of the United States and a supplemental national sample. PARTICIPANTS: 10,577 physicians who provided care to adults in 1998 or 1999 were surveyed for the Community Tracking Study (response rate, 61%). MEASUREMENTS: The End-of-Life Expenditure Index, a measure of spending that reflects differences in the overall quantity of medical services provided rather than differences in illness or price, was used to determine health care intensity in the physicians' community. Outcomes included physicians' perceived availability of clinical services, ability to provide high-quality care to patients, and career satisfaction.
RESULTS: Although the highest-intensity regions have substantially more hospital beds and specialists per capita, physicians in these regions reported more difficulty obtaining needed services for their patients. The proportion of physicians who felt able to obtain elective hospital admissions ranged from 50% in high-intensity regions to 64% in the lowest-intensity region (P < 0.001 for the relationship between intensity and perceived ability to obtain hospital admissions); the proportion of physicians who felt able to obtain high-quality specialist referrals ranged from 64% in high-intensity regions to 79% in low-intensity regions (P < 0.001). Compared with low-intensity regions, fewer physicians in high-intensity regions felt able to maintain good ongoing patient relationships (range, 62% to 70%; P < 0.001) or able to provide high-quality care (range, 72% to 77%; P = 0.009). In most cases, differences persisted but were attenuated in magnitude after adjustment for physician attributes, practice characteristics, and local market factors (for example, managed care penetration); the difference in perceived ability to provide high-quality care was no longer statistically significant (P = 0.099). LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design prevented demonstration of a causal relationship between intensity and physician perceptions of quality.
CONCLUSION: Despite more resources, physicians in regions of high health care intensity did not report greater ease in obtaining needed services or greater ability to provide high-quality care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16670133     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-9-200605020-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  37 in total

1.  Role of community and individual characteristics in physician visits for persons with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Chris Tonner; Laura Trupin; Jinoos Yazdany; Lindsey Criswell; Patricia Katz; Edward Yelin
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Trends in anemia management in lung and colon cancer patients in the US Department of Veterans Affairs, 2002-2008.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tarlov; Kevin T Stroupe; Todd A Lee; Thomas W Weichle; Qiuying L Zhang; Laura C Michaelis; Howard Ozer; Margaret M Browning; Denise M Hynes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Market variations in intensity of Medicare service use and beneficiary experiences with care.

Authors:  Jessica N Mittler; Bruce E Landon; Elliot S Fisher; Paul D Cleary; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Seniors' perceptions of health care not closely associated with physician supply.

Authors:  David J Nyweide; Denise L Anthony; Chiang-Hua Chang; David Goodman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Regional variations in medical expenditure and hospitalization days for heart attack patients in Japan: evidence from the Tokai Acute Myocardial Study (TAMIS).

Authors:  Haruko Noguchi; Satoshi Shimizutani; Yuichiro Masuda
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-01-19

Review 6.  What rate of utilization is appropriate in musculoskeletal care?

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; John Erik Bell; Jim Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Inpatient care intensity and patients' ratings of their hospital experiences.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Kristen Bronner; Jonathan S Skinner; Elliott S Fisher; David C Goodman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Multiple Health Problems in Elderly People: Adapting what is known.

Authors:  John H Wasson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-08

9.  Fostering accountable health care: moving forward in medicare.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Mark B McClellan; John Bertko; Steven M Lieberman; Julie J Lee; Julie L Lewis; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Disease severity and radioactive iodine use for thyroid cancer.

Authors:  M R Haymart; D G Muenz; A K Stewart; J J Griggs; M Banerjee
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.