Literature DB >> 16669915

Can prostate biopsies affect erectile function?

M Chrisofos1, A G Papatsoris, A Dellis, I M Varkarakis, A Skolarikos, C Deliveliotis.   

Abstract

The impact of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies on erectile function was prospectively studied. Forty-six men (median age: 67.51 years) who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsies completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 questionnaire at the day of the biopsy, 1 and 3 months later. Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity was classified into five categories. Concomitant ED-related systemic diseases and/or medications that could affect erectile function were also recorded. The paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. The median IIEF-5 score was 15.91 prior to biopsies, while 1 and 3 months after, the median IIEF-5 score was 14.33 and 14.81 respectively (P > 0.05). Prior to prostate biopsies, ED was reported by 38 patients (82.60%): mild ED in 39.13%, mild to moderate in 19.56%, moderate in 15.21% and severe ED in 8.69%. Concomitant ED-related systemic diseases and/or medications were recorded in 28 patients (60.86%). One month after, ED was revealed in 42 patients (91.30%): mild ED in 26.08%, mild to moderate in 30.43%, moderate in 19.56%, and severe ED in 15.21%. Three months post-biopsy, ED was reported by 41 patients (89.13): mild ED in 21.73%, mild to moderate in 28.26%, moderate in 21.73%, and severe ED in 17.39%. Overall, three and two patients (6.52% and 4.34%) had prostate biopsy attributed ED (i.e. without concomitant ED-related disease or medication) 1 and 3 months after prostate biopsies. TRUS-guided prostate biopsies did not induce ED in a statistically significant manner. Evaluating potency at referral for TRUS-guided prostate biopsies is advisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16669915     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2006.00714.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrologia        ISSN: 0303-4569            Impact factor:   2.775


  6 in total

Review 1.  The impact of prostate biopsy on urinary symptoms, erectile function, and anxiety.

Authors:  Alexander P Glaser; Kristian Novakovic; Brian T Helfand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Optimization of prostate biopsy: review of technique and complications.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; James S Wysock; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Penile Rehabilitation Strategies Among Prostate Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

4.  A Longitudinal Study of Predictors of Sexual Dysfunction in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shane M Pearce; Chi-Hsiung E Wang; David E Victorson; Brian T Helfand; Kristian R Novakovic; Charles B Brendler; Jeffrey A Albaugh
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.491

5.  Evaluation of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective cohort trial.

Authors:  Teresa R Zembower; Kelly M Maxwell; Robert B Nadler; John Cashy; Marc H Scheetz; Chao Qi; Anthony J Schaeffer
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological Report.

Authors:  Walker W Laranja; Brunno C F Sanches; Brunno R I Voris; João C C Alonso; Fabiano A Simões; Ronald F Rejowski; Leonardo O Reis
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2019-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.