Literature DB >> 16667411

Triazine Resistance in Senecio vulgaris Parental and Nearly Isonuclear Backcrossed Biotypes Is Correlated with Reduced Productivity.

W B McCloskey1, J S Holt.   

Abstract

Isonuclear triazine-susceptible and triazine-resistant Senecio vulgaris L. biotypes were developed by making reciprocal crosses between susceptible and resistant biotypes to obtain F(1) hybrids and backcrossing the hybrids to the appropriate pollen parent. The electrophoretic isozyme patterns of the enzyme aconitase obtained from leaf extracts of triazine-susceptible parental (S) and backcrossed (SxR(BC6)) biotypes, and triazine-resistant parental (R) and backcrossed (RxS(BC6)) biotypes verified that the biotypes had the expected nuclear genomes. Atrazine inhibition of chloroplast whole chain electron transport from water to methyl viologen was measured to verify susceptibility or resistance to triazine herbicides. The photosynthetic rate and biomass accumulation of greenhouse grown susceptible and resistant S. vulgaris biotypes were measured 28, 35, 42, 50, 57, and 64 days after planting to determine the effect of altered chloroplast function. S and SxR(BC6) biotypes had CO(2) assimilation rates of 16.2 and 16.6 micromoles CO(2) per square meter per second, respectively, and I(50) values (herbicide concentration producing 50% inhibition) of about 0.49 micromolar atrazine. The corresponding values for the R and RxS(BC6) biotypes were 14.7 and 14.6 micromoles CO(2) per square meter per second with I(50) values of 65.0 micromolar atrazine. The S biotype was larger and more productive than the R biotype at all harvests. At the harvest 57 days after planting, mean shoot dry weight was 33.2 and 8.7 grams for the S and R biotypes, respectively. The growth effect associated with chloroplast differences was shown in comparisons of the S biotype with the RxS(BC6) biotype and of the SxR(BC6) biotype with the R biotype. The RxS(BC6) biotype had 72% of the shoot dry weight of the S biotype while the R biotype had 55% of the shoot dry weight of the SxR(BC6) biotype. The RxS(BC6) and R biotypes produced about 73 and 62% of the leaf area of the S and SxR(BC6) biotypes, respectively. Relative growth rate was similar in biotypes with the same nuclear genome; however, instantaneous unit leaf rate was higher in the S compared to the RxS(BC6) biotype and in the SxR(BC6) compared to the R biotype. At 57 days after planting, the cumulative leaf area duration (i.e. photosynthetic opportunity) of the RxS(BC6) and R biotypes was 86 and 66% of that of the S and SxR(BC6) biotypes, respectively. Our data indicate that impaired chloroplast function in triazine resistant S. vulgaris biotypes limits growth and productivity at the whole plant level.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 16667411      PMCID: PMC1062401          DOI: 10.1104/pp.92.4.954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  8 in total

1.  Pathological changes due to massive schistosomal infection in man (a case presentation).

Authors:  Z A Andrade; S G Andrade; M Susin
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  1974 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.846

2.  Altered Leaf Structure and Function in Triazine-Resistant Common Groundsel (Senecio vulgaris).

Authors:  J S Holt; D P Goffner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Characterization of Chloroplasts Isolated from Triazine-Susceptible and Triazine-Resistant Biotypes of Brassica campestris L.

Authors:  J J Burke; R F Wilson; J R Swafford
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Determination of the Rate Limiting Step for Photosynthesis in a Nearly Isonuclear Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Biotype Resistant to Atrazine.

Authors:  P A Jursinic; R W Pearcy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Differential Light Responses of Photosynthesis by Triazine-resistant and Triazine-susceptible Senecio vulgaris Biotypes.

Authors:  J S Holt; A J Stemler; S R Radosevich
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Comparison of Triazine-Resistant and -Susceptible Biotypes of Senecio vulgaris and Their F(1) Hybrids.

Authors:  A E Stowe; J S Holt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Characterization of Triazine-Resistant and -Susceptible Isolines of Canola (Brassica napus L.).

Authors:  K C Vaughn
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Triazine Resistance without Reduced Vigor in Phalaris paradoxa.

Authors:  M Schönfeld; T Yaacoby; O Michael; B Rubin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 8.340

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Photosynthetic electron transport in thylakoids from cotton cultivars (Gossypium sp.) differing in tolerance to prometryn.

Authors:  R A Khan; W T Molin
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  The role of biomarkers in environmental assessment (4). Terrestrial plants.

Authors:  W H Ernst; P J Peterson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  The cost of herbicide resistance in white-chicory: ecological implications for its commercial release.

Authors:  C Lavigne; H Manac'h; C Guyard; J Gasquez
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 4.  A unified approach to the estimation and interpretation of resistance costs in plants.

Authors:  M M Vila-Aiub; P Neve; F Roux
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Pleiotropy in Triazine-Resistant Brassica napus: Ontogenetic and Diurnal Influences on Photosynthesis.

Authors:  J H Dekker; R G Burmester
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Fitness Cost Associated With Enhanced EPSPS Gene Copy Number and Glyphosate Resistance in an Amaranthus tuberculatus Population.

Authors:  Helen M Cockerton; Shiv S Kaundun; Lieselot Nguyen; Sarah Jane Hutchings; Richard P Dale; Anushka Howell; Paul Neve
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.