Literature DB >> 16666020

Photoperiodic and genetic control of carbon partitioning in peas and its relationship to apical senescence.

M O Kelly1, P J Davies.   

Abstract

Apical senescence but not flower initiation is delayed by short days (SD) compared to long days (LD) in pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) of genotype E Sn Hr. We recently reported that delay of senescence correlated with slower reproductive development, suggesting that fruits are weaker sinks for assimilates under delayed senescence conditions. Thus, we have examined assimilate partitioning in peas to determine if genotype and photoperiod regulate relative sink strength. Assimilate diversion by developing fruit has been implicated in senescence induction. A greater percentage of leaf-exported (14)C was transported to fruits and a smaller percentage to the apical bud of G2 peas (genotype E Sn Hr) in LD than in SD. Relatively more of the (14)C delivered to the apical bud of G2 peas was transported to flower buds than to young leaves in LD as compared to SD. There was no striking photoperiodic difference in carbon partitioning in genetic lines without the Sn Hr allele combination. The Sn Hr allele combination and photoperiod may regulate the relative strength of reproductive and vegetative sinks. Photoperiodic differences in sink strength early in reproduction suggest that these genes regulate sink strength by affecting the physiology of the whole plant. High vegetative sink strength in SD may maintain assimilate supply to the apical bud, delaying senescence.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 16666020      PMCID: PMC1054606          DOI: 10.1104/pp.86.3.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  8 in total

1.  Experimental Modification of Plant Senescence.

Authors:  A C Leopold; E Niedergang-Kamien; J Janick
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1959-09       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Photoperiod modification of [C]gibberellin a(12) aldehyde metabolism in shoots of pea, line g2.

Authors:  P J Davies; P R Birnberg; S L Maki; M L Brenner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Ageing in the whole plant.

Authors:  D J Carr; J S Pate
Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol       Date:  1967

4.  Ageing and senescence in the whole plant.

Authors:  P F Wareing; A K Seth
Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol       Date:  1967

5.  Studies on Genetic Male-Sterile Soybeans : III. The Initiation of Monocarpic Senescence.

Authors:  J J Burke; W Kalt-Torres; J R Swafford; J W Burton; R F Wilson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Effects of pod removal on metabolism and senescence of nodulating and nonnodulating soybean isolines: I. Metabolic constituents.

Authors:  S J Crafts-Brandner; F E Below; J E Harper; R H Hageman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Photosynthate Partitioning into Starch in Soybean Leaves: I. Effects of Photoperiod versus Photosynthetic Period Duration.

Authors:  N J Chatterton; J E Silvius
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Photoperiodic control of apical senescence in a genetic line of peas.

Authors:  W M Proebsting; P J Davies; G A Marx
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 8.340

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Maternal, Single-Gene Regulation of Assimilate Partitioning in Pea.

Authors:  M. O. Kelly; R. M. Spanswick
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Hormonal regulation of leaf senescence through integration of developmental and stress signals.

Authors:  Rubina Jibran; Donald A Hunter; Paul P Dijkwel
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Mechanism of export of organic material from the developing fruits of pea.

Authors:  D A Hamilton; P J Davies
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Sucrose and Malic Acid as the Compounds Exported to the Apical Bud of Pea following CO(2) Labeling of the Fruit : No Evidence for a Senescence Factor.

Authors:  D A Hamilton; P J Davies
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Carbon Transfer and Partitioning between Vegetative and Reproductive Organs in Pisum sativum L.

Authors:  M H Jeuffroy; F R Warembourg
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Expression of the le Mutation in Young Ovaries of Pisum sativum and Its Effect on Fruit Development.

Authors:  C. M. Santes; P. Hedden; V. M. Sponsel; J. B. Reid; J. L. Garcia-Martinez
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  A whole-system reconsideration of paradigms about photoperiod and temperature control of crop yield.

Authors:  D H Wallace; R W Zobel; K S Yourstone
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Resource partitioning to male and female flowers of Spinacia oleracea L. in relation to whole-plant monocarpic senescence.

Authors:  Diane E Sklensky; Peter J Davies
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Inflorescence Meristem Fate Is Dependent on Seed Development and FRUITFULL in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Vicente Balanzà; Irene Martínez-Fernández; Shusei Sato; Martin F Yanofsky; Cristina Ferrándiz
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Senescence: The Compromised Time of Death That Plants May Call on Themselves.

Authors:  Matin Miryeganeh
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.