Literature DB >> 16665887

Acid and alkaline invertases in suspension cultures of sugar beet cells.

H Masuda1, T Takahashi, S Sugawara.   

Abstract

Alkaline invertase was induced during the initiation of suspension cultures of single cells from leaf explants of sugar beets in Murashige-Skoog liquid medium which contained benzyladenine. This activity was barely detectable in the leaves themselves. In suspension cultures, the presence of both acid and alkaline invertases was detected; alkaline invertase was only present in the cytoplasm of the cultured cells, whereas acid invertase was present in the cytoplasm and cell walls, and was also detected in the culture medium. The cell wall contained at least three types of acid invertase; two of these activities were solubilized by saline (saline-released) and EDTA (EDTA-released), respectively, and the third remained tightly associated with the cell wall. Saline-released and EDTA-released invertases from the cell wall showed the significant differences in their properties: the saline-released enzyme had the highest affinity for sucrose among the invertases tested, and was easily bound to cell walls, to DNA, and to a cation exchanger, unlike the EDTA-released enzyme. Sucrose is the source of carbon for plant cells in suspension culture and is probably degraded in the cell wall by the saline-released invertase, which had the highest activity and the highest affinity for sucrose. Hexose products of this degradation would be transported to cytoplasm. Soluble invertase, EDTA-released invertase from the cell wall, and one of two extracellular invertases behaved similarly upon chromatography on DEAE-cellulose. They had similar activity profiles with changing pH, and similar K(m) values for sucrose. Thus it appears that they are identical. Two extracellular invertases found in the growth medium of the suspension cultures were probably identical with those in the soluble fraction of callus and seedlings of sugar beets, because they showed similar behaviors during chromatography on DEAE-cellulose, and had similar activity profiles with changing pH and K(m) values for sucrose.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 16665887      PMCID: PMC1054473          DOI: 10.1104/pp.86.1.312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  7 in total

1.  Notes on sugar determination.

Authors:  M SMOGYI
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1952-03       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The partial purification and some properties of two sucrases of Phaseolus vulgaris.

Authors:  R A Cooper; R N Greenshields
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Stereospecificity of the glucose carrier in sugar beet suspension cells.

Authors:  E Zamski; R E Wyse
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Release of enzymes from cell walls by an endopectate-trans-eliminase.

Authors:  G J Stephens; R K Wood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Carbon assimilation in carrot cells in liquid culture.

Authors:  J Kanabus; R A Bressan; N C Carpita
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Purification and Some Properties of Cell Wall-bound Invertases from Sugar Beet Seedlings and Aged Slices of Mature Roots.

Authors:  H Masuda; S Sugawara
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Change in invertase activity of sweet potato in response to wounding and purification and properties of its invertases.

Authors:  K Matsushita; I Uritani
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 8.340

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Cell wall proteins from sugar beet cells in suspension culture.

Authors:  H Masuda; S Komiyama; S Sugawara
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Structural Analysis of the Catalytic Mechanism and Substrate Specificity of Anabaena Alkaline Invertase InvA Reveals a Novel Glucosidase.

Authors:  Jin Xie; Kun Cai; Hai-Xi Hu; Yong-Liang Jiang; Feng Yang; Peng-Fei Hu; Dong-Dong Cao; Wei-Fang Li; Yuxing Chen; Cong-Zhao Zhou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A Re-Evaluation of the Relative Roles of Two Invertases, INCW2 and IVR1, in Developing Maize Kernels and Other Tissues.

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Sugar Levels Modulate Differential Expression of Maize Sucrose Synthase Genes.

Authors:  K. E. Koch; K. D. Nolte; E. R. Duke; D. R. McCarty; W. T. Avigne
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Acid and Neutral Invertases in the Mesocarp of Developing Muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. cv Prince) Fruit.

Authors:  A P Ranwala; S S Iwanami; H Masuda
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Sucrose-metabolizing enzymes in transport tissues and adjacent sink structures in developing citrus fruit.

Authors:  C A Lowell; P T Tomlinson; K E Koch
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Cell wall invertase in tobacco crown gall cells : enzyme properties and regulation by auxin.

Authors:  M Weil; T Rausch
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Sink Metabolism in Tomato Fruit : IV. Genetic and Biochemical Analysis of Sucrose Accumulation.

Authors:  S Yelle; R T Chetelat; M Dorais; J W Deverna; A B Bennett
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Purification and characterization of soluble (cytosolic) and bound (cell wall) isoforms of invertases in barley (Hordeum vulgare) elongating stem tissue.

Authors:  N Karuppiah; B Vadlamudi; P B Kaufman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  A promising approach on biomass accumulation and withanolides production in cell suspension culture of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal.

Authors:  Ganeshan Sivanandhan; Gnanajothi Kapil Dev; Murugaraj Jeyaraj; Manoharan Rajesh; Manickam Muthuselvam; Natesan Selvaraj; Markandan Manickavasagam; Andy Ganapathi
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.356

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.