Literature DB >> 16663991

Comparative Water Relations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus acutifolius Gray.

A H Markhart1.   

Abstract

Leaf area expansion, dry weight, and water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. acutifolius Gray were compared during a drying cycle in the greenhouse to understand the characteristics which contribute to the superior drought tolerance of P. acutifolius. Stomates of P. acutifolius closed at a much higher water potential than those of P. vulgaris, delaying dehydration of leaf tissue. P. acutifolius had a more deeply penetrating root system, which also contributes to its drought tolerance. Root-shoot ratios did not differ between the two species either under well watered or water stressed conditions. Leaf osmotic potential was also similar in the two species, with no apparent osmotic adjustment during water stress. These results indicate that P. acutifolius postpones dehydration and suggest that sensitive stomates and a deeply penetrating root system are characteristics which, if incorporated into cultivated beans, might increase their drought tolerance.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 16663991      PMCID: PMC1064467          DOI: 10.1104/pp.77.1.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  2 in total

1.  Stomatal diffusion resistance of snap beans. I. Influence of leaf-water potential.

Authors:  E T Kanemasu; C B Tanner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants.

Authors:  P F Scholander; E D Bradstreet; E A Hemmingsen; H T Hammel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Hydration-state-responsive proteins link cold and drought stress in spinach.

Authors:  C Guy; D Haskell; L Neven; P Klein; C Smelser
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Leaf water relations characteristics of Lupinus angustifolius and L. cosentinii.

Authors:  C R Jensen; I E Henson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Orphan legumes: harnessing their potential for food, nutritional and health security through genetic approaches.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Chongtham; Elangbam Lamalakshmi Devi; Kajal Samantara; Jeshima Khan Yasin; Shabir Hussain Wani; Soumya Mukherjee; Ali Razzaq; Ingudam Bhupenchandra; Aanandi Lal Jat; Laishram Kanta Singh; Amit Kumar
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Contrasting Phaseolus Crop Water Use Patterns and Stomatal Dynamics in Response to Terminal Drought.

Authors:  Jose A Polania; Violeta Salazar-Chavarría; Ingrid Gonzalez-Lemes; Alexis Acosta-Maspons; Caspar C C Chater; Alejandra A Covarrubias
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Control of Paraheliotropism in Two Phaseolus Species.

Authors:  F. Yu; V. S. Berg
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Phosphorylation of SWEET sucrose transporters regulates plant root:shoot ratio under drought.

Authors:  Qingchao Chen; Tao Hu; Xiaohua Li; Chun-Peng Song; Jian-Kang Zhu; Liqing Chen; Yang Zhao
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 17.352

7.  Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought.

Authors:  Stephen E Beebe; Idupulapati M Rao; Matthew W Blair; Jorge A Acosta-Gallegos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Growth and physiological responses of three warm-season legumes to water stress.

Authors:  Gurjinder S Baath; Alexandre C Rocateli; Vijaya Gopal Kakani; Hardeep Singh; Brian K Northup; Prasanna H Gowda; Jhansy R Katta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.