Literature DB >> 16662599

Comparative Phytochrome Immunochemistry as Assayed by Antisera against Both Monocotyledonous and Dicotyledonous Phytochrome.

M M Cordonnier1, L H Pratt.   

Abstract

Preparation and characterization of antisera against lettuce (Lactuca sativa L., cv. Grand Rapids) and pea (Pisum sativum L., cv. Alaska) phytochrome is described. These antisera, together with previously obtained antisera against zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L., cv. Black Beauty) and oat (Avena sativa L., cv. Garry) phytochrome, were used to compare by Ouchterlony double immunodiffusion phytochrome isolated from etiolated lettuce, pea, bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., cv. Taylor Horticultural Bush), zucchini, oat and rye (Secale cereale L., cv. Balbo) seedlings. Cross reactivity between monocotyledonous phytochrome and antidicotyledonous-phytochrome serum and between dicotyledonous phytochrome and antimonocotyledonous-phytochrome serum was always weak or not perceptible by this assay. Among the four dicotyledonous phytochromes examined, pea and bean were the most similar immunochemically as anticipated. Pea and lettuce phytochrome somewhat unexpectedly also exhibited similar immunochemical reactivity. Zucchini phytochrome by contrast was immunochemically distinct from pea, bean, and lettuce phytochrome, although it did react with all three antidicotyledonous-phytochrome sera. Initial attempts to identify immunoglobulins that would recognize phytochrome regardless of its source indicated that they may exist. Such immunoglobulins are of interest because they might react with one or more determinants that could be part of an active site of phytochrome. These immunoglobulins, once isolated, could thus serve as a potential probe for the active site of phytochrome.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 16662599      PMCID: PMC1065794          DOI: 10.1104/pp.70.3.912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  7 in total

1.  Immunological and physical characterization of the products of phytochrome proteolysis.

Authors:  S C Cundiff; L H Pratt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Immunochemistry of phytochrome.

Authors:  H V Rice; W R Briggs
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  "Disaggregation" of phytochrome in vitro-a consequence of proteolysis.

Authors:  G Gardner; C S Pike; H V Rice; W R Briggs
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Phytochrome immunoaffinity purification.

Authors:  R E Hunt; L H Pratt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Immunopurification and initial characterization of dicotyledonous phytochrome.

Authors:  M M Cordonnier; L H Pratt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Comparative immunochemistry of phytochrome.

Authors:  L H Pratt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Phytochrome Characterization by Rabbit Antiserum against High Molecular Weight Phytochrome.

Authors:  S C Cundiff; L H Pratt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 8.340

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Molecular cloning of cDNA for Avena phytochrome.

Authors:  H P Hershey; J T Colbert; J L Lissemore; R F Barker; P H Quail
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Light-mediated changes in two proteins found associated with plasma membrane fractions from pea stem sections.

Authors:  S Gallagher; T W Short; P M Ray; L H Pratt; W R Briggs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nitrate reductase of green algae is located in the pyrenoid.

Authors:  A Lopez-Ruiz; J P Verbelen; J M Roldan; J Diez
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Blue-light mediated accumulation of nuclear-encoded transcripts coding for proteins of the thylakoid membrane is absent in the phytochrome-deficient aurea mutant of tomato.

Authors:  R Oelmüller; R E Kendrick; W R Briggs
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Native phytochrome: immunoblot analysis of relative molecular mass and in-vitro proteolytic degradation for several plant species.

Authors:  R D Vierstra; M M Cordonnier; L H Pratt; P H Quail
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Spectral Characterization and Proteolytic Mapping of Native 120-Kilodalton Phytochrome from Cucurbita pepo L.

Authors:  R D Vierstra; P H Quail
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Characterization of Tobacco Expressing Functional Oat Phytochrome : Domains Responsible for the Rapid Degradation of Pfr Are Conserved between Monocots and Dicots.

Authors:  J R Cherry; H P Hershey; R D Vierstra
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Characterization by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of monoclonal antibodies to pisum and Avena phytochrome.

Authors:  M M Cordonnier; H Greppin; L H Pratt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Identification of a highly conserved domain on phytochrome from angiosperms to algae.

Authors:  M M Cordonnier; H Greppin; L H Pratt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Phosphate-starvation response in plant cells: de novo synthesis and degradation of acid phosphatases.

Authors:  S M Duff; W C Plaxton; D D Lefebvre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.