Literature DB >> 16658933

Iron requirement and iron uptake from various iron compounds by different plant species.

R A Christ1.   

Abstract

The Fe requirements of four monocotyledonous plant species (Avena sativa L., Triticum aestivum L., Oryza sativa L., Zea mays L.) and of three dicotyledonous species (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill., Cucumis sativus L., Glycine maxima (L.) Merr.) in hydroponic cultures were ascertained. Fe was given as NaFe-EDDHA chelate (Fe ethylenediamine di (O-hydroxyphenylacetate). I found that the monocotyledonous species required a substantially higher Fe concentration in the nutrient solution in order to attain optimum growth than did the dicotyledonous species. Analyses showed that the process of iron uptake was less efficient with the monocotyledonous species. When the results obtained by using chelated Fe were compared with those using ionic Fe, it was shown that the inefficient species were equally inefficient in utilizing Fe(3+) ions. However, the differences between the efficient and the inefficient species disappeared when Fe(2+) was used. This confirms the work of others who postulated that Fe(3+) is reduced before uptake of chelated iron by the root. In addition, it was shown that reduction also takes place when Fe is used in ionic form. The efficiency of Fe uptake seems to depend on the efficiency of the root system of the particular plant species in reducing Fe(3+). The removal of Fe from the chelate complex after reduction to Fe(2+) seems to present no difficulties to the various plant species.

Entities:  

Year:  1974        PMID: 16658933      PMCID: PMC367458          DOI: 10.1104/pp.54.4.582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  6 in total

1.  Competition Between Chelating Agents and Roots as Factor Affecting Absorption of Iron and Other Ions by Plant Species.

Authors:  J C Brown; L O Tiffin; R S Holmes
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1960-11       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Iron accumulation, root peroxidase activity, and varietal interactions in soybean genotypes that differ in iron nutrition.

Authors:  G W Elmstrom; F D Howard
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Iron-stress Response in Mixed and Monocultures of Soybean Cultivars.

Authors:  J E Ambler; J C Brown
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Obligatory reduction of ferric chelates in iron uptake by soybeans.

Authors:  R L Chaney; J C Brown; L O Tiffin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Effect of iron on the transport of citrate into the xylem of soybeans and tomatoes.

Authors:  J C Brown; R L Chaney
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Translocation of iron citrate and phosphorus in xylem exudate of soybean.

Authors:  L O Tiffin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 8.340

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Sites of absorption and translocation of iron in barley roots: tracer and microautoradiographic studies.

Authors:  D T Clarkson; J Sanderson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Daily changes in nitrate influx, efflux and metabolism in maize and pearl millet.

Authors:  C J Pearson; R J Volk; W A Jackson
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.116

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.