Literature DB >> 16656221

Pressure and flow relations in vascular bundles of the tomato plant.

A E Dimond1.   

Abstract

In the tomato plant water flows through primary xylem in accordance with Poiseuille's law. This relation and the analogy between Poiseuille's and Ohm's law were employed to calculate rates of flow and differences in pressure within vascular bundles when transpiration rates from individual leaves were known. The resistance of vascular bundles to flow was calculated from a modification of Poiseuille's law and from measurements of vessels in all bundles. The rates of flow in all bundles were derived from a set of simultaneous linear equations of flow, written to correspond with the nature of the vascular network. Values of the difference in pressure associated with flow in bundles were derived from resistances and flow rates in individual bundles. These agreed substantially with values observed in a comparable plant.In large bundles, vessels occur in a frequency distribution that is approximately normal with respect either to the logarithms of their radii or to the fourth power of their radii. The largest vessels in a bundle transport most of the water when they are functioning.The tomato plant contains 2 types of vascular bundle. The large bundles of the stem form a network by joining above each node in combinations of 2 at a time. The small bundles of the stem and petiolar bundles are independent of other bundles from their origins at junctions to their termini. The small bundles offer high resistance to flow, whereas the resistance of large bundles is low. The average conductance of large bundles decreases from the base to the apex of the stem. That of small vascular bundles remains low and more or less constant throughout the plant.Only a small difference in pressure is required to maintain flow in large bundles. For lower leaves, the driving pressure required to move water to the base of a petiole is considerably less than that which moves water through petioles. The difference in pressure that maintains flow increases steadily for successively higher nodes. However, the pressure that drives flow to leaves is not always greater for higher leaves than for intermediate ones. For the plant examined, the highest leaves required a smaller amount of energy to move water from the ground than intermediate leaves did. This was also true of the power expended in moving water to individual leaves.In the large network bundles, significant cross transfer of flow occurs at junction points from one bundic to another. Because of the interconnections between large bundles. pressure and flow relations are apparently not greatly altered when localized dysfunction occurs in the vessels of large bundles. In small, independent bundles, a localized dysfunction in vessels produces a significant effect on pressure and flow relations.

Entities:  

Year:  1966        PMID: 16656221      PMCID: PMC1086308          DOI: 10.1104/pp.41.1.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  4 in total

1.  The Rise of Sap in Tall Grapevines.

Authors:  P F Scholander; W E Love; J W Kanwisher
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Water Transport: This classical problem in plant physiology is becoming increasingly amenable to mathematical analysis.

Authors:  J Bonner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants.

Authors:  P F Scholander; E D Bradstreet; E A Hemmingsen; H T Hammel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cohesive Lift of Sap in the Rattan Vine: The problem of how sap rises lies stranded for lack of means to measure negative pressure in liquids.

Authors:  P F Scholander; E Hemmingsen; W Garey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Stomatal dimensions and resistance to diffusion.

Authors:  J Y Parlange; P E Waggoner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Stomatal Responses to Pressure Changes and Interruptions in the Water Supply of Detached Leaves of Zea mays L.

Authors:  K Raschke
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Nonsynchronized Oscillations in Stomatal Resistance among Sclerophylls of Eucalyptus umbra.

Authors:  C T Teoh; J H Palmer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Colonization, competition, and dispersal of pathogens in fluid flow networks.

Authors:  Albert Siryaporn; Minyoung Kevin Kim; Yi Shen; Howard A Stone; Zemer Gitai
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Water movement in coffee seedlings (Coffea arabica L.) : Evaluation of various resistances.

Authors:  A J Tesha; D Kumar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Water potential gradients in field tobacco.

Authors:  J E Begg; N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Image analysis of anatomical traits in stalk transections of maize and other grasses.

Authors:  Sven Heckwolf; Marlies Heckwolf; Shawn M Kaeppler; Natalia de Leon; Edgar P Spalding
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.993

8.  Bioinspired tuning of hydrogel permeability-rigidity dependency for 3D cell culture.

Authors:  Min Kyung Lee; Max H Rich; Kwanghyun Baek; Jonghwi Lee; Hyunjoon Kong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.