Literature DB >> 16652843

COMPARATIVE RESPONSES OF LONG-DAY AND SHORT-DAY PLANTS TO RELATIVE LENGTH OF DAY AND NIGHT.

W W Garner1.   

Abstract

Year:  1933        PMID: 16652843      PMCID: PMC439034          DOI: 10.1104/pp.8.3.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  EFFECT OF VARIATION IN LENGTH OF DAY ON GROWTH AND DORMANCY OF TREES.

Authors:  P J Kramer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1936-01       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Climatic niche and flowering and fruiting phenology of an epiphytic plant.

Authors:  Narayani Barve; Craig E Martin; A Townsend Peterson
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.276

3.  A role for GIGANTEA: keeping the balance between flowering and salinity stress tolerance.

Authors:  Hee Jin Park; Woe-Yeon Kim; Dae-Jin Yun
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2013-05-03

Review 4.  Recent achievement in gene cloning and functional genomics in soybean.

Authors:  Zhengjun Xia; Hong Zhai; Shixiang Lü; Hongyan Wu; Yupeng Zhang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-07

5.  Projected climate-driven changes in pollen emission season length and magnitude over the continental United States.

Authors:  Yingxiao Zhang; Allison L Steiner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The flowering of SDP chrysanthemum in response to intensity of supplemental or night-interruptional blue light is modulated by both photosynthetic carbon assimilation and photoreceptor-mediated regulation.

Authors:  Jingli Yang; Jinnan Song; Byoung Ryong Jeong
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 6.627

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.