Literature DB >> 16652120

The drug diagnostic co-development concept paper: commentary from the 3rd FDA-DIA-PWG-PhRMA-BIO Pharmacogenomics Workshop.

L M Hinman1, S-M Huang, J Hackett, W H Koch, P Y Love, G Pennello, A Torres-Cabassa, C Webster.   

Abstract

At the Washington DC Pharmacogenomics in Drug Development and Regulatory Decision-Making: Workshop III - Three Years of Promise, Proposals and Progress on Optimizing the Benefit/Risk of Medicines (11-13 April 2005), one break-out session (Track 2) focused on co-development of therapeutic drug and diagnostic products. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft concept paper shortly before the workshop was to convene. Track 2 was a forum for initial discussion of the content of the concept paper, and industry's initial reactions. After the workshop, formal commentaries on the co-development concept paper were submitted by several trade associations (e.g., Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), American Association for Clinical Chemistry) and individual companies to FDA's Docket No. 2004N-0279. This paper includes a summary of the key features of the draft concept paper, the discussion in Track 2 of the April, 2005 meeting and highlights of the industry comments submitted to the FDA docket following the meeting.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16652120     DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J        ISSN: 1470-269X            Impact factor:   3.550


  5 in total

1.  Variability in Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha Antibody Specificity May Impact Clinical Utility of Immunohistochemistry Assays.

Authors:  Timothy R Holzer; Leslie O'Neill Reising; Kelly M Credille; Andrew E Schade; Gerard J Oakley
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 2.  The Labyrinth of Product Development and Regulatory Approvals in Liquid Biopsy Diagnostics.

Authors:  Federico M Goodsaid
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  A perspective on challenges and issues in biomarker development and drug and biomarker codevelopment.

Authors:  Sheila E Taube; Gary M Clark; Janet E Dancey; Lisa M McShane; Caroline C Sigman; Steven I Gutman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Integration of proteomics, bioinformatics, and systems biology in traumatic brain injury biomarker discovery.

Authors:  J D Guingab-Cagmat; E B Cagmat; R L Hayes; J Anagli
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay versuspolymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano do Brasil; Rodolfo Castro; Liane de Castro
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.743

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.