Literature DB >> 16651830

A bioequivalence study of two oral desmopressin tablet formulations.

Stefan T Kaehler1, Ilka M Steiner, Robert Sauermann, Helmut Scheidl, Markus Mueller, Christian Joukhadar.   

Abstract

The present study was carried out to test bioequivalence between two different oral desmopressin formulations. Sixty healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to receive the test (T) and reference (R) drug in a two-period two-sequence, crossover, analyst-blinded study design. Subjects received an oral dose of 400 mug of desmopressin acetate separated by a wash-out period of at least 7 days. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over 12 h in plasma and the maximum concentration (C(max)) were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) after log transformation. The mean ratios of the T to R drug were within the bioequivalence boundaries with mean values of 1.00 (90% CI: 0.87-1.14) and 1.03 (90% CI: 0.92-1.15) for AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf), respectively. For the C(max), the mean ratio of the T to R drug was 0.97 (90% CI: 0.87-1.08). The rate and the extent of oral desmopressin absorption were identical for both formulations. Hence, the desmopressin test tablet met all bioequivalence criteria of the marketed reference desmopressin tablet. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16651830     DOI: 10.1159/000092625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacology        ISSN: 0031-7012            Impact factor:   2.547


  3 in total

1.  Clinical study shows improved absorption of desmopressin with novel formulation.

Authors:  Nelly Fransén; Susanne Bredenberg; Erik Björk
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Claiming desmopressin therapeutic equivalence in children requires pediatric data: a population PKPD analysis.

Authors:  Robin Michelet; Lien Dossche; Charlotte Van Herzeele; Jan Van Bocxlaer; An Vermeulen; Johan Vande Walle
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  An Integrated Paediatric Population PK/PD Analysis of dDAVP: How do PK Differences Translate to Clinical Outcomes?

Authors:  Robin Michelet; Lien Dossche; Charlotte Van Herzeele; Pauline De Bruyne; Elke Gasthuys; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Johan Vande Walle; An Vermeulen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 6.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.