Literature DB >> 16650625

The use of GEE for analyzing longitudinal binomial data: a primer using data from a tobacco intervention.

Ji-Hyun Lee1, Thaddeus A Herzog, Cathy D Meade, Monica S Webb, Thomas H Brandon.   

Abstract

Longitudinal study designs in addictive behaviors research are common as researchers have focused increasingly on how various explanatory variables affect responses over time. In particular, such designs are used in intervention studies that have multiple follow-up points. These designs typically involve repeated measurement of participants' responses, and thus correlation within each participant is expected. Correct inferences can only be obtained by taking into account this within-participant correlation between repeated measurements, which can complicate the analysis of longitudinal data. In recent years, generalized estimating equations (GEE) has become a standard method for analyzing non-normal longitudinal data, yet it often is not utilized by addiction researchers. The goal of this article is to provide an overview of the GEE approach for analyzing correlated binary data for behavioral researchers, using data from an intervention study on the prevention of relapse to tobacco smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16650625     DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  43 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of large-scale neuronal recording data.

Authors:  Jamie L Reed; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2010-04-26

2.  Inability to access addiction treatment and risk of HIV infection among injection drug users recruited from a supervised injection facility.

Authors:  M-J S Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Ruth Zhang; Mark Tyndall; Julio Montaner; Evan Wood
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Increased burden of suicidality among young street-involved sex workers who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada.

Authors:  Brittany Barker; Scott E Hadland; Huiru Dong; Kate Shannon; Thomas Kerr; Kora DeBeck
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  Prevention for college students who suffer alcohol-induced blackouts could deter high-cost emergency department visits.

Authors:  Marlon P Mundt; Larissa I Zakletskaia
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Enhancing tobacco quitline effectiveness: identifying a superior pharmacotherapy adjuvant.

Authors:  Stevens S Smith; Paula A Keller; Kate H Kobinsky; Timothy B Baker; David L Fraser; Terry Bush; Brooke Magnusson; Susan M Zbikowski; Timothy A McAfee; Michael C Fiore
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Socioeconomic disparities in telephone-based treatment of tobacco dependence.

Authors:  Merilyn Varghese; Christine Sheffer; Maxine Stitzer; Reid Landes; S Laney Brackman; Tiffany Munn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Does Medical Expansion Improve Population Health?

Authors:  Hui Zheng; Linda K George
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2018-02-01

8.  Smoking cessation in smokers who smoke menthol and non-menthol cigarettes.

Authors:  Stevens S Smith; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Facilitating needs based cancer care for people with a chronic disease: Evaluation of an intervention using a multi-centre interrupted time series design.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Afaf Girgis; Claire Johnson; Geoff Mitchell; Patsy Yates; Linda Kristjanson; Martin Tattersall; Christophe Lecathelinais; David Sibbritt; Brian Kelly; Emma Gorton; David Currow
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  A descriptive analysis of relations between parents' self-reported smoking behavior and infants' daily exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Doris Kehl; Jochen R Thyrian; Jan Lüdemann; Matthias Nauck; Ulrich John
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.