Literature DB >> 16650270

Reduction of RV pacing by continuous optimization of the AV interval.

Goran Milasinovic1, Johannes Sperzel, Timothy W Smith, Hardwin Mead, Johan Brandt, Wesley K Haisty, J Russell Bailey, Marc Roelke, Jay Simonson, Bart Gerritse, Jennifer Englund, Steven J Compton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients requiring permanent pacing, preservation of intrinsic ventricular activation is preferred whenever possible. The Search AV+ (SAV+) algorithm in Medtronic EnPulsetrade mark dual-chamber pacemakers can increase atrioventricular (AV) intervals to 320 ms in patients with intact or intermittent AV conduction. This prospective, multicenter study compared the percentage of ventricular pacing with and without AV interval extension.
METHODS: Among 197 patients enrolled in the study, the percentage of ventricular-paced beats was evaluated via device diagnostics at the 1-month follow-up. Patient cohorts were defined by clinician assessment of conduction via a 1:1 AV conduction test at the 2-week follow-up. The observed percentage of ventricular pacing with SAV + ON and the predicted percentage of ventricular pacing with SAV + OFF were determined from the SAV + histogram data for the period between the 2-week and 1-month follow-up visits.
RESULTS: Of 197 patients, 110 (55.8%) had intact 1:1 AV conduction, of which 109 had 1-month data. SAV + remained ON in 99/109 patients; 10 patients had intrinsic A-V conduction intervals beyond SAV + nominal and therefore SAV + disabled. The mean percentage of ventricular pacing in the 109 patients was SAV+ ON = 23.1% (median 3.7%) versus SAV + OFF = 97.2% (median 99.7%). In 87 patients without 1:1 AV conduction, SAV + was programmed OFF in 6, automatically disabled in 52, and remained ON in 29. In 8 of these patients, 80-100% reduction in ventricular pacing was observed with SAV + ON.
CONCLUSION: The Search AV+ algorithm in the EnPulse pacemaker effectively promotes intrinsic ventricular activation and substantially reduces unnecessary ventricular pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16650270     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00361.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Minimizing right ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with intact and compromised atrioventricular conduction : Results from the EVITA Trial.

Authors:  A Bauer; J Vermeulen; L Toivonen; J Voitk; C Barr; P Peytchev
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 2.  New concepts in physiologic cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Dwight W Reynolds; Christina M Murray
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  [Avoidance of ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node disease or intermittent AV block].

Authors:  U K H Wiegand
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

4.  Difference in percentage of ventricular pacing between two algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing: results of the IDEAL RVP (Identify the Best Algorithm for Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing) study.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Murakami; Naoya Tsuboi; Yasuya Inden; Yukihiko Yoshida; Toyoaki Murohara; Zenichi Ihara; Mitsuaki Takami
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Effectiveness of Ventricular Intrinsic Preference (VIP™) and Ventricular AutoCapture (VAC) algorithms in pacemaker patients: Results of the validate study.

Authors:  Rakesh Yadav; Aparna Jaswal; Sridevi Chennapragada; Prakash Kamath; Shirish M S Hiremath; Dhiman Kahali; Sumit Anand; Naresh K Sood; Anil Mishra; Jitendra S Makkar; Upendra Kaul
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-10-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.