Literature DB >> 16650167

A simple digital image processing system to aid in melanoma diagnosis in an everyday melanocytic skin lesion unit: a preliminary report.

Aglaia G Manousaki1, Andreas G Manios, Evgenia I Tsompanaki, John G Panayiotides, Dimitris D Tsiftsis, Anastasia K Kostaki, Androniki D Tosca.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For early melanoma diagnosis, experienced dermatologists have an accuracy of 64-80% using clinical diagnostic criteria, usually the ABCD rule, while automated melanoma diagnosis systems are still considered to be experimental and serve as adjuncts to the naked-eye expert prediction. In an attempt to aid in early melanoma diagnosis, we developed an image processing program with the aim to discriminate melanoma from melanocytic nevi, establishing a mathematical model to come up with a melanoma probability.
METHODS: Digital images of 132 melanocytic skin lesions (23 melanomas and 109 melanocytic nevi) were studied in features of geometry, color, and color texture. A total of 43 variables were studied for all lesions, e.g., geometry, color texture, sharpness of border, and color variables. Univariate logistic regression analysis followed by "-2 log likelihood" test and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used to eliminate inappropriate variables, as the presence of multi-collinearity among variables could cause severe problems in any stepwise variable selection method. Initially, "-2 log likelihood" and nonparametric Spearman's rho picked five variables to be included in a multivariate model of prediction. The five-variable model was then reduced to three variables and the performance of each model was tested. The "jackknife" method was performed in order to validate the model with the three variables and its accuracy was weighed vs. the five-variable model by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve plotting. It was concluded that the reduced model did not compromise discriminatory power.
RESULTS: Not all variables contributed much to the model, therefore they were progressively eliminated and the model was finally reduced to three covariates of significance. A predictive equation was calculated, incorporating parameters of geometry, color, and color texture as independent covariates for the prediction of melanoma. The proposed model provides melanoma probability with a 60.9% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity of prediction, an overall accuracy of 89.4% (probability level 0.5), and 8% false-negative results.
CONCLUSIONS: Through a digital image processing system and the development of a mathematical model of prediction, discrimination between melanomas and melanocytic nevi seems feasible with a high rate of accuracy using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The proposed model is an alternative method to aid in early melanoma diagnosis. Expensive and sophisticated equipment is not required and it can be easily implemented in a reasonably priced portable programmable computer, in order to predict previously undiagnosed skin melanoma before histopathology results confirm diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16650167     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2006.02726.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dermatol        ISSN: 0011-9059            Impact factor:   2.736


  8 in total

1.  An Integrated Platform for Skin Cancer Heterogenous and Multilayered Data Management.

Authors:  Ilias Maglogiannis; Georgia Kontogianni; Olga Papadodima; Haralampos Karanikas; Antonis Billiris; Aristotelis Chatziioannou
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A new fully automatic and robust algorithm for fast segmentation of liver tissue and tumors from CT scans.

Authors:  Laurent Massoptier; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Jacqueline Dinnes; Naomi Chuchu; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Rubeta N Matin; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan O'Connell; Matthew D Gardiner; Jeffrey Bamber; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

4.  Automatic Detection of Malignant Melanoma using Macroscopic Images.

Authors:  Maryam Ramezani; Alireza Karimian; Payman Moallem
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2014-10

5.  Automatic diagnosis of melanoma using machine learning methods on a spectroscopic system.

Authors:  Lin Li; Qizhi Zhang; Yihua Ding; Huabei Jiang; Bruce H Thiers; James Z Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Computer-aided clinical image analysis as a predictor of sentinel lymph node positivity in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Marios Papadakis; Alexandros Paschos; Andreas S Papazoglou; Andreas Manios; Hubert Zirngibl; Georgios Manios; Dimitra Koumaki
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-24

7.  Lacunarity analysis: a promising method for the automated assessment of melanocytic naevi and melanoma.

Authors:  Stephen Gilmore; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Jim Muir; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Computer aided diagnostic support system for skin cancer: a review of techniques and algorithms.

Authors:  Ammara Masood; Adel Ali Al-Jumaily
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-12-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.