Literature DB >> 16650074

Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research.

K A Kaphingst1, J M Janoff, L N Harris, K M Emmons.   

Abstract

Although social and ethical issues related to the storage and use of biologic specimens for genetic research have been discussed extensively in the medical literature, few empiric data exist describing patients' views. This qualitative study explored the views of 26 female breast cancer patients who had consented to donate blood or tissue samples for breast cancer research. Participants generally did not expect personal benefits from research and had few unprompted concerns. Few participants had concerns about use of samples for studies not planned at the time of consent. Some participants did express concerns about insurance or employment discrimination, while others believed that current privacy protections might actually slow breast cancer research. Participants were generally more interested in receiving individual genetic test results from research studies than aggregate results. Most participants did not want individual results of uncertain clinical significance, although others believed that they should be able to receive such information. These data examined the range of participants' views regarding the storage and use of biologic samples. Further research with different and diverse patient populations is critical to establishing an appropriate balance between protecting the rights of human subjects in genetic research and allowing research to progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16650074     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00614.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  27 in total

1.  Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Carie R Kennedy; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Alexander Eastman; Ellen Iverson; Erica Shehane; Aaron Celious; Jennifer Barillas; Brian Clarridge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.

Authors:  Colin Me Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-28

Review 3.  Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rene Sterling; Gail E Henderson; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Biobanking residual tissues.

Authors:  Peter H J Riegman; Evert-Ben van Veen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) in Clinical Genetics Research.

Authors:  Daryl Pullman; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  Association of acculturation, nativity, and years living in the United States with biobanking among individuals of Mexican descent.

Authors:  David S Lopez; Maria E Fernandez; Miguel Angel Cano; Claudia Mendez; Chu-Lin Tsai; David W Wetter; Sara S Strom
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  "As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study.

Authors:  Sonia Yip; Jennifer Fleming; Heather L Shepherd; Adam Walczak; Jonathan Clark; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-09

8.  Development and Validation of the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS) in English and Spanish.

Authors:  Sharon H Baik; Mariana Arevalo; Clement Gwede; Cathy D Meade; Paul B Jacobsen; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.

Authors:  Teddy D Warner; Carol J Weil; Christopher Andry; Howard B Degenholtz; Lisa Parker; Latarsha J Carithers; Michelle Feige; David Wendler; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples.

Authors:  E Vermeulen; M K Schmidt; N K Aaronson; M Kuenen; M-J Baas-Vrancken Peeters; H van der Poel; S Horenblas; H Boot; V J Verwaal; A Cats; F E van Leeuwen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.