Literature DB >> 16649831

Distinguishing bipolar major depression from unipolar major depression with the screening assessment of depression-polarity (SAD-P).

David A Solomon1, Andrew C Leon, Jack D Maser, Christine J Truman, William Coryell, Jean Endicott, Jedediah J Teres, Martin B Keller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with bipolar I or II major depression are often misdiagnosed with unipolar major depression. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a brief instrument to screen for bipolar disorder in patients actively ill with major depression.
METHOD: The sample consisted of subjects who enrolled in the National Institute of Mental Health-Collaborative Program on the Psychobiology of Depression-Clinical Studies from 1978 to 1981 during an episode of major depression and included 91 subjects with bipolar I major depression, 52 with bipolar II major depression, and 338 with unipolar major depression diagnosed according to Research Diagnostic Criteria. Most of the subjects were inpatients at the time of enrollment, and subjects were prospectively followed for up to 20 years. In order to create, test, and cross-validate the screening instrument, a split-sample data analytic procedure was performed. This procedure yielded 3 groups of subjects: the bipolar I index sample, the bipolar I cross-validation sample, and the bipolar II cross-validation sample. Each group included subjects with bipolar major depression and subjects with unipolar major depression. Within the bipolar I index sample, subjects with bipolar I major depression at study intake were compared with subjects with unipolar major depression at study intake on a pool of 59 sociodemographic and clinical candidate variables. The 3 variables showing the greatest disparity between bipolar I subjects and unipolar subjects were selected for the screen, the Screening Assessment of Depression-Polarity (SAD-P). The operating characteristics of the SAD-P were then examined within the bipolar I index sample, bipolar I cross-validation sample, and bipolar II cross-validation sample.
RESULTS: The items selected for the screening instrument were (1) presence of delusions during the current episode of major depression, (2) number of prior episodes of major depression, and (3) family history of major depression or mania. The screen identified bipolar major depression with a sensitivity of 0.82 in the bipolar I index sample, 0.72 in the bipolar I cross-validation sample, and 0.58 in the bipolar II cross-validation sample. With regard to misclassifying subjects with unipolar major depression, the screen provided a positive predictive value of 0.36 in the bipolar I index sample, 0.29 in the bipolar I cross-validation sample, and 0.27 in the bipolar II cross-validation sample.
CONCLUSION: We suggest using the 3-item SAD-P as a preliminary screen for bipolar disorder in patients who present with an active episode of major depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16649831     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  11 in total

1.  Association between bipolar spectrum features and treatment outcomes in outpatients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Roy H Perlis; Rudolf Uher; Michael Ostacher; Joseph F Goldberg; Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12-06

2.  Subthreshold hypomanic symptoms in progression from unipolar major depression to bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Jess G Fiedorowicz; Jean Endicott; Andrew C Leon; David A Solomon; Martin B Keller; William H Coryell
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  DOES SCREENING WITH THE MDQ AND EPDS IMPROVE IDENTIFICATION OF BIPOLAR DISORDER IN AN OBSTETRICAL SAMPLE?

Authors:  Crystal T Clark; Dorothy K Y Sit; Kara Driscoll; Heather F Eng; Andrea L Confer; James F Luther; Stephen R Wisniewski; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 6.505

4.  Risks for the transition from major depressive disorder to bipolar disorder in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Authors:  Stephen E Gilman; Jamie M Dupuy; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  Depression in bipolar disorder versus major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Authors:  Carmen Moreno; Deborah S Hasin; Celso Arango; Maria A Oquendo; Eduard Vieta; Shangmin Liu; Bridget F Grant; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 6.  Distinguishing between unipolar depression and bipolar depression: current and future clinical and neuroimaging perspectives.

Authors:  Jorge Renner Cardoso de Almeida; Mary Louise Phillips
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 7.  Bipolar disorder diagnosis: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Mary L Phillips; David J Kupfer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Differences in symptom expression between unipolar and bipolar spectrum depression: Results from a nationally representative sample using item response theory (IRT).

Authors:  Nicolas Hoertel; Carlos Blanco; Hugo Peyre; Melanie M Wall; Kibby McMahon; Philip Gorwood; Cédric Lemogne; Frédéric Limosin
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  The prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorder in elderly patients with recurrent depression.

Authors:  Chang-In Lee; Young-Eun Jung; Moon-Doo Kim; Seong-Chul Hong; Won-Myong Bahk; Bo-Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Evaluation of Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) in patients with mood disorders: a multicenter trial across China.

Authors:  Hai-Chen Yang; Tie-Bang Liu; Han Rong; Jian-Qiang Bi; Er-Ni Ji; Hong-Jun Peng; Xiao-Ping Wang; Yi-Ru Fang; Cheng-Mei Yuan; Tian-Mei Si; Zheng Lu; Jian Hu; Zhi-Yu Chen; Yi Huang; Jing Sun; Hui-Chun Li; Chen Hu; Jin-Bei Zhang; Ling-Jiang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.