BACKGROUND: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is increased in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); however, the determinants of NT-proBNP level have not been clarified in HCM. HYPOTHESIS: This study was performed to determine the relationship between NT-proBNP levels and various echocardiographic variables of patients with HCM and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: We assessed plasma NT-proBNP levels and echocardiographic variables of 36 patients (19 men, 58 +/- 14 years) with HCM and an LVEF of > or = 55%. Echocardiographic variables measured were LV wall thickness, end-diastolic LV internal dimension (LVIDd) and volume (LVEDV), LV mass, and LV mass index (LV mass/body surface area, LVMI). Left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient, transmitral E and A velocities, deceleration time (DT) of the transmitral E wave, and septal annular E' velocity were measured by Doppler technique. The relationship between echocardiographic variables and plasma NT-proBNP level was analyzed. RESULTS: The plasma NT-proBNP level was 775.2 +/- 994.2 pg/ml (range 33.1-4729.0 pg/ml). It showed positive correlations with LV end-diastolic septal thickness (r = 0.39, p = 0.010) and LVMI (r = 0.27, p = 0.050), while it revealed negative correlations with LVIDd (r = -0.44, p = 0.004), LVEDV (r = -0.44, p = 0.004) and DT(r = -0.31,p = 0.034). The NT-proBNP level was higher in the patients with than in those without LV diastolic dysfunction (p = 0.033) and was independently related to LVIDd (p = 0.001), LVMI (p = 0.006) and DT (p = 0.031) by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCM and normal LVEF, the amount of LV hypertrophy and LV diastolic dysfunction may exert a significant role in determining plasma NT-proBNP level.
BACKGROUND: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is increased in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); however, the determinants of NT-proBNP level have not been clarified in HCM. HYPOTHESIS: This study was performed to determine the relationship between NT-proBNP levels and various echocardiographic variables of patients with HCM and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: We assessed plasma NT-proBNP levels and echocardiographic variables of 36 patients (19 men, 58 +/- 14 years) with HCM and an LVEF of > or = 55%. Echocardiographic variables measured were LV wall thickness, end-diastolic LV internal dimension (LVIDd) and volume (LVEDV), LV mass, and LV mass index (LV mass/body surface area, LVMI). Left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient, transmitral E and A velocities, deceleration time (DT) of the transmitral E wave, and septal annular E' velocity were measured by Doppler technique. The relationship between echocardiographic variables and plasma NT-proBNP level was analyzed. RESULTS: The plasma NT-proBNP level was 775.2 +/- 994.2 pg/ml (range 33.1-4729.0 pg/ml). It showed positive correlations with LV end-diastolic septal thickness (r = 0.39, p = 0.010) and LVMI (r = 0.27, p = 0.050), while it revealed negative correlations with LVIDd (r = -0.44, p = 0.004), LVEDV (r = -0.44, p = 0.004) and DT(r = -0.31,p = 0.034). The NT-proBNP level was higher in the patients with than in those without LV diastolic dysfunction (p = 0.033) and was independently related to LVIDd (p = 0.001), LVMI (p = 0.006) and DT (p = 0.031) by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCM and normal LVEF, the amount of LV hypertrophy and LV diastolic dysfunction may exert a significant role in determining plasma NT-proBNP level.
Authors: Y Mizuno; M Yoshimura; E Harada; M Nakayama; T Sakamoto; Y Shimasaki; H Ogawa; K Kugiyama; Y Saito; K Nakao; H Yasue Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2000-11-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Y Hirata; A Matsumoto; T Aoyagi; K Yamaoki; I Komuro; T Suzuki; T Ashida; T Sugiyama; Y Hada; I Kuwajima; M Nishinaga; H Akioka; O Nakajima; R Nagai; Y Yazaki Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: C Briguori; S Betocchi; F Manganelli; B Gigante; M A Losi; Q Ciampi; R Gottilla; A Violante; C G Tocchetti; M Volpe; M Chiariello Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: F Manganelli; S Betocchi; M A Losi; C Briguori; L Pace; Q Ciampi; P Perrone-Filardi; M Salvatore; F Finizio; E Pezzella; M Chiariello Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1999-02-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Margaret M Redfield; Richard J Rodeheffer; Steven J Jacobsen; Douglas W Mahoney; Kent R Bailey; John C Burnett Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-09-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Yu Ueda; JoAnn L Yee; Amber Williams; Jeffrey A Roberts; Kari L Christe; Joshua A Stern Journal: Comp Med Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Jay M Edelberg; Amy J Sehnert; Matthew E Mealiffe; Carlos L Del Rio; Robert McDowell Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Drugs Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Céleste Chevalier; Miriam Wendner; Anna Suling; Ersin Cavus; Kai Muellerleile; Gunnar Lund; Paulus Kirchhof; Monica Patten Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2022-08-16
Authors: Sofia Hanås; Bodil S Holst; Katja Höglund; Jens Häggström; Anna Tidholm; Ingrid Ljungvall Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2020-03-22 Impact factor: 3.333