Literature DB >> 16649698

Why innovation in health care is so hard.

Regina E Herzlinger1.   

Abstract

Health care in the United States--and in most other developed countries--is ailing. Medical treatment has made astonishing advances, but the packaging and delivery of health care are often inefficient, ineffective, and user unfriendly. Problems ranging from costs to medical errors beg for ingenious solutions-and indeed, enormous investments have been made in innovation. But too many efforts fail. To find out why, it's necessary to break down the problem, look at the different types of innovation, and examine the forces that affect them. Three kinds of innovation can make health care better and cheaper: One changes the ways consumers buy and use health care, another taps into technology, and the third generates new business models. The health care system erects an array of barriers to each type of innovation. More often than not, organizations can overcome the barriers by managing the six forces that have an impact on health care innovation: players, the friends and foes who can bolster or destroy;funding, the revenue-generation and capital-acquisition processes, which differ from those in other industries; policy, the regulations that pervade the industry; technology, the foundation for innovations that can make health care delivery more efficient and convenient; customers, the empowered and engaged consumers of health care; and accountability, the demand from consumers, payers, and regulators that innovations be safe, effective, and cost-effective. Companies can often turn these six forces to their advantage. The analytical framework the author describes can also be used to examine other industries. Cataloging the innovation types and identifying the forces that aid or undermine them can reveal insights on how to treat chronic innovation ills- prescriptions that will make any industry healthier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16649698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Bus Rev        ISSN: 0017-8012


  40 in total

1.  Healthcare technology and technology assessment.

Authors:  James H Herndon; Raymond Hwang; K J Bozic; K H Bozic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A hybrid approach for integrated healthcare cooperative purchasing and supply chain configuration.

Authors:  Nazaré Rego; João Claro; Jorge Pinho de Sousa
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-12-28

Review 3.  Current challenges in health economic modeling of cancer therapies: a research inquiry.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Miller; Kathleen A Foley; Mason W Russell
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-05

4.  The Implementation Chasm Hindering Genome-informed Health Care.

Authors:  Kevin B Johnson; Ellen Wright Clayton; Justin Starren; Josh Peterson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  The Need for Disruptive Innovation in Pharmacy.

Authors:  Naser Z Alsharif
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Long-Term Health and Economic Value of Improved Mobility among Older Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Mina Kabiri; Michelle Brauer; Jason Shafrin; Jeff Sullivan; Thomas M Gill; Dana P Goldman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 7.  The impact of economic evaluation on quality management in spine surgery.

Authors:  Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Using Smart City Technology to Make Healthcare Smarter.

Authors:  Diane J Cook; Glen Duncan; Gina Sprint; Roschelle Fritz
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 10.961

Review 9.  "One Health" Approach for Health Innovation and Active Aging in Campania (Italy).

Authors:  Vincenzo De Luca; Giovanni Tramontano; Luigi Riccio; Ugo Trama; Pietro Buono; Mario Losasso; Umberto Marcello Bracale; Giovanni Annuzzi; Rosa Zampetti; Francesco Cacciatore; Giannamaria Vallefuoco; Alberto Lombardi; Anna Marro; Mariarosa Anna Beatrice Melone; Cristina Ponsiglione; Maria Luisa Chiusano; Giancarlo Bracale; Gaetano Cafiero; Aurelio Crudeli; Carmine Vecchione; Maurizio Taglialatela; Donatella Tramontano; Guido Iaccarino; Maria Triassi; Regina Roller-Wirnsberger; Jean Bousquet; Maddalena Illario
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-11

10.  Why a successful task substitution in glaucoma care could not be transferred from a hospital setting to a primary care setting: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kim M Holtzer-Goor; Thomas Plochg; Hans G Lemij; Esther van Sprundel; Marc A Koopmanschap; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.