Literature DB >> 16649221

Cancer-specific survival and predictors of prostate-specific antigen recurrence and survival in patients with seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy.

Fernando P Secin1, Fernando J Bianco, Andrew J Vickers, Victor Reuter, Thomas Wheeler, Paul A Fearn, James A Eastham, Peter T Scardino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the current study were to determine the long-term biochemical recurrence (BCR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates for men with seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and to identify risk factors for freedom from BCR and CSS in patients who received treatment in the prostate-specific antigen era and who had SVI identified at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP).
METHODS: Prospective clinical, pathologic, and outcome data were collected for 5377 men who underwent RP between June 1983 and August 2004. There were 936 patients who were excluded because they received treatment before RP. Multivariable analysis was used to identify the factors that predicted BCR and CSS.
RESULTS: Among 4441 eligible patients, 387 patients (8.7%) had SVI, and 91 of those 387 patients (24%) had lymph node involvement (LNI). In total, 210 patients experienced BCR. For patients without LNI, the 10-year and 15-year freedom from BCR rates were 36% and 32%, respectively, and the corresponding CSS rates were 89% and 81%, respectively. For the 91 men who had SVI and LNI, the 10-year BCR-free probability was 10%, but the 10-year CSS probability was 74%. By 10 years, patients with LNI were 3 times more likely to die from cancer than from other causes; nonetheless, 66% of patients were alive despite their advanced stage. The preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, extracapsular extension, LNI, and Gleason grade were associated independently with BCR. Gleason scores of 8 to 10 and LNI were significant predictors of CSS.
CONCLUSIONS: SVI does not invariably signal BCR or death from cancer in patients who undergo RP and pelvic lymph node dissection. Fifteen years later, approximately 33% of men with SVI and negative lymph nodes are expected remain free of BCR, and CSS was surprisingly good. Copyright (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16649221     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  Cell cycle progression score improves risk stratification in prostate cancer patients with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xun Shangguan; Hongyang Qian; Zhou Jiang; Zhixiang Xin; Jiahua Pan; Baijun Dong; Wei Xue
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) without adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Aurélien Forgues; François Rozet; François Audenet; Adil Ouzzane; Rafaël Sanchez-Salas; Eric Barret; Marc Galiano; Dominique Prapotnich; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A contemporary analysis of outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Jonathan I Epstein; Misop Han; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancers-Review of Literature.

Authors:  N Srivatsa; H Nagaraja; S Shweta; S K Raghunath
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-05

5.  Is it necessary to remove the seminal vesicles completely at radical prostatectomy? decision curve analysis of European Society of Urologic Oncology criteria.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin; Fernando J Bianco; Angel Cronin; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Bertrand Guillonneau; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.

Authors:  Xun Shangguan; Baijun Dong; Yanqing Wang; Fan Xu; Xiaoguang Shao; Jianjun Sha; Yinjie Zhu; Jiahua Pan; Wei Xue
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Comparison of three different tools for prediction of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Kevin C Zorn; Lars Budäus; Maxine Sun; David I Lee; Arieh L Shalhav; Gregory P Zagaya; Sergey A Shikanov; Ofer N Gofrit; Alan E Thong; David M Albala; Leon Sun; Angel Cronin; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Locally advanced and high risk prostate cancer: The best indication for initial radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-04-16

9.  Risk stratification for disease progression in pT3 prostate cancer after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Hong; Young Suk Kwon; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  The impact of disease progression on perceived health status and quality of life of long-term cancer survivors.

Authors:  Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Jan-Willem W Coebergh; Jan A Roukema; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.