Literature DB >> 16648864

Immunophenotypic diversity of endometrial adenocarcinomas: implications for differential diagnosis.

Michelle Reid-Nicholson1, Pratibha Iyengar, Amanda J Hummer, Irina Linkov, Marina Asher, Robert A Soslow.   

Abstract

Many endometrial adenocarcinomas, particularly those of endometrioid type, express estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and vimentin. This typical immunophenotype is frequently considered a standard against which others are compared when immunohistochemistry is used for differential diagnosis. We tested large numbers of endometrial cancers, enriched for high-grade tumors, to determine whether this reported immunophenotype was valid and whether expression differences between types of endometrial carcinoma could be exploited for diagnostic purposes. Immunohistochemical stains were performed on the following types of endometrial cancers using established methodology: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grades 1 and 2 endometrioid-42; FIGO grade 3 endometrioid-40; serous-24; clear cell-11; carcinosarcoma-9. In total, 92% of serous carcinomas expressed p16 strongly compared to weak-to-moderate expression of p16 in 7-67% of other tumors (FIGO grades 1 and 2 carcinoma and carcinosarcoma, respectively). A total of 84% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 carcinomas expressed ER compared to 9-54% of other tumors (clear cell and serous carcinomas respectively); 83% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 expressed PR compared to 11-54% of other carcinomas (carcinosarcoma and serous carcinoma, respectively). Most carcinomas were negative for monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (mCEA), and those that were positive showed mostly only focal membrane expression. Vimentin was expressed in nearly every tumor. Most tumors were diffusely vimentin positive, but a large range of expression patterns, from focal to diffuse and from weak to strong, was noted. Only 70% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 endometrioid carcinomas and 26% of grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas possessed the reportedly characteristic endometrial cancer immunophenotype p16 (-), ER (+), PR (+), mCEA (-), and vimentin (+). Endometrial cancers demonstrate substantial immunophenotypic diversity that remained apparent even within groups of similar histologic subtype and grade. ER, PR, and p16 expression was more illustrative of tumor type and degree of differentiation than they were of endometrial origin. In contrast, the vimentin-positive/CEA-negative phenotype remained the most constant among all endometrial cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16648864     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  32 in total

1.  Secondary malignancies of the uterine cervix: a potential diagnostic pitfall.

Authors:  Gian Franco Zannoni; Valerio Gaetano Vellone; Marco Petrillo; Guido Fadda; Esther Diana Rossi; Giovanni Scambia; Arnaldo Carbone
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Diagnostic Algorithmic Proposal Based on Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Evaluation of 297 Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Luis Chiriboga; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus.

Authors:  Haixia Wu; Lin Zhang; Wenfeng Cao; Yuanjing Hu; Yixin Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

5.  International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC): A New Pathogenetic Classification for Invasive Adenocarcinomas of the Endocervix.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Insights into endometrial serous carcinogenesis and progression.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-10

Review 7.  Cutaneous metastases of endometrial carcinoma: report of an unusual case and literature review.

Authors:  Yuan Fan; Hao Deng; Li Tian; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  The usefulness of immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays of Human Papillomavirus negative adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Michael Odida; Belen Lloveras; Nuria Guimera; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-03-03

9.  The genomics and genetics of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Andrea J O'Hara; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Adv Genomics Genet       Date:  2012-03

10.  p16 INK4 and CEA can be mutually exchanged with confidence between both relevant three-marker panels (ER/Vim/CEA and ER/Vim/p16 INK4) in distinguishing primary endometrial adenocarcinomas from endocervical adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.

Authors:  Chih-Ping Han; Ming-Yung Lee; Yeu-Sheng Tyan; Lai-Fong Kok; Chung-Chin Yao; Po-Hui Wang; Jeng-Dong Hsu; Szu-Wen Tseng
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.