Literature DB >> 16648699

The risk of local infective complications after damage control procedures for femoral shaft fracture.

Paul J Harwood1, Peter V Giannoudis, Christian Probst, Christian Krettek, Hans-Christoph Pape.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine infection rates after damage control orthopaedics (DCO) and primary intramedullary nailing (1' IMN) in multiply injured patients with femoral shaft fracture.
DESIGN: Retrospective case analysis.
SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: All patients with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) >20 and femoral shaft fracture (AO 32-) treated in our unit between 1996 and 2002. INTERVENTION: Damage control orthopaedics, defined as primary external fixation of the femoral shaft fracture and subsequent conversion to an intramedullary nail, or primary IMN. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of infection classified as contamination (positive swabs with no clinical change), superficial, deep (requiring surgery), and removal of hardware (those requiring removal of femoral instrumentation or amputation).
RESULTS: A total of 173 patients with 192 fractures were included; 111 fractures were treated by DCO and 81 by primary IMN. Mean follow-up was 19.1 months [median, 16.7, range, 1 (patient died)-67 months]. DCO patients had a significantly higher NISS and more grade III open fractures (P<0.001). IMN procedures took a median of 150 minutes compared with 85 minutes for DCO (P<0.0001). Although wound contamination (including contaminated pin sites) was more common in the DCO group (P<0.05), the risk of infectious complications was equivalent (P=0.86). Contamination was significantly more likely when conversion to IMN occurred after more than 14 days (P<0.05); however, this did not lead to more clinically relevant infections. Logistic regression analysis showed that although a DCO approach was not associated with infection, delay before conversion in the DCO group might be [P=0.002 for contamination and removal of hardware, P=0.065 for serious infection (deep or worse), not significant for other infection outcomes]. Grade III open injury also was significantly associated with serious infection in all patients (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Infection rates after DCO for femoral fractures are comparable to those after primary IMN. We see no contraindication to the implementation of a damage control approach for severely injured patients with femoral shaft fracture where appropriate. Pin-site contamination was more common where the fixator was in place for more than 2 weeks. For patients treated by using a DCO approach, conversion to definitive fixation should be performed in a timely fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16648699     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200603000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  18 in total

1.  Reconstruction of Large Diaphyseal Defects of the Femur and the Tibia with Autologous Bone.

Authors:  Charles E Dumont; Ulrich G Exner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Intramedullary nailing after external fixation of the femur and tibia: a review of advantages and limits.

Authors:  P Pairon; C Ossendorf; S Kuhn; A Hofmann; P M Rommens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  [Complex knee injury in polytraumatized patients].

Authors:  P Kobbe; M Frink; B A Zelle; H C Pape
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Subtrochanteric fractures].

Authors:  Thomas Gösling
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk for complications (borderline patients).

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Pape; Dieter Rixen; John Morley; Elisabeth Ellingsen Husebye; Michael Mueller; Clemens Dumont; Andreas Gruner; Hans Joerg Oestern; Michael Bayeff-Filoff; Christina Garving; Dustin Pardini; Martijn van Griensven; Christian Krettek; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  In vitro effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) using a 660 nm laser and malachite green dye in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms arranged on compact and cancellous bone specimens.

Authors:  Luciano Pereira Rosa; Francine Cristina da Silva; Sumaia Alves Nader; Giselle Andrade Meira; Magda Souza Viana
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Strategies to minimize soft tissues and septic complications in staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures.

Authors:  Gianluca Canton; Federico Santolini; Marco Stella; Antonio Moretti; Michele Francesco Surace; Luigi Murena
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-01-01

8.  The dangers of damage control orthopedics: a case report of vascular injury after femoral fracture external fixation.

Authors:  Gregory R Staeheli; Michael R Fraser; Steven J Morgan
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2012-03-26

9.  Protocol for a randomized controlled trial on risk adapted damage control orthopedic surgery of femur shaft fractures in multiple trauma patients.

Authors:  Dieter Rixen; Eva Steinhausen; Stefan Sauerland; Rolf Lefering; Matthias Meier; Marc G Maegele; Bertil Bouillon; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Sonication of intramedullary nails: clinically-related infection and contamination.

Authors:  J Esteban; E Sandoval; J Cordero-Ampuero; D Molina-Manso; A Ortiz-Pérez; R Fernández-Roblas; E Gómez-Barrena
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.