Literature DB >> 16648656

Comparison of clinical stage, therapy response, and patient outcome between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Pooja R Rohatgi1, Stephen G Swisher, Arlene M Correa, Tsung-T Wu, Zhongxing Liao, Garrett L Walsh, Ara A Vaporciyan, David C Rice, Norio Fukami, Jack A Roth, Jaffer A Ajani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the differences in clinical stage, pathologic response to chemoradiotherapy, patterns of failure, and overall survival (OS) between patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ACA) of the esophagus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We stratified patients by two histologies, ACA and SCC, and statistically compared their clinical stage, post-therapy pathologic response, patterns of failure, and OS.
RESULTS: Of the 235 patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy, 42 (18%) had SCC and 193 (82%) had ACA. Among the ACA patients, a significantly larger proportion was male (93% vs 7%; p <0.001), whereas sex was distributed similarly among SCC patients (55% male vs 45% female; p = 0.5). A significantly larger percentage of SCC patients were classified as lower TN and overall stage than ACA patients (T2 = 41% vs 28%, p <0.0001; N0 = 69% vs 48%, p = 0.01; stage II = 76% vs 55%, p <0.001). A significantly greater portion of SCCs was categorized as pathologic N0 after treatment (71% vs 65%; p = 0.02). Among the pathCR patients in clinical stage II, there were significantly greater proportion of SCC patients (77% vs 63%; p <0.001) than ACA patients. Among the pathCR patients in clinical stage III patients, a significantly greater proportion were ACA patients (38% vs 23%; p <0.001) than SCC patients. The median and 5-yr OS was 53 +/- 11 mo and 39% for ACA patients and 35 +/- 14 mo and 37% for SCC (median OS, p = 0.3). Among pathCR patients, median OS of ACA patients (133 mo) was longer than that of SCC patients but nonsignificant (29 mo; p = 0.07); results were similar for non-pathCR patients. DFS results were similar in all subgroups. Among the whole cohort, incidence of local-regional recurrence and distant metastases did not vary significantly. The median time to distant metastases did not vary significantly for pathCR and non-pathCR patients.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe this is the first study that compares failure outcome of ACA and SCC patients with similar clinical stage after trimodality therapy. Our data suggest that significant differences in clinical stage and post-therapy pathologic stage exist between ACA and SCC. Frequent presence of malignant nodes in the resected specimens of ACA patients resulted in a shorter time-to-metastases suggesting that ACA patients need better systemic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16648656     DOI: 10.1385/IJGC:36:2:69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer        ISSN: 1537-3649


  15 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer--the advent of the era of individualization.

Authors:  Masaki Kitajima; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Long-term survival following induction chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  J I Lew; W E Gooding; U Ribeiro; A V Safatle-Ribeiro; M C Posner
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-07

3.  Combined preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Interim analysis of a phase II trial.

Authors:  M Stahl; H Wilke; U Fink; M Stuschke; M K Walz; J R Siewert; M Molls; W Fett; H B Makoski; N Breuer; U Schmidt; W Niebel; H Sack; F W Eigler; S Seeber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Intensive chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  A A Forastiere; R F Heitmiller; D J Lee; M Zahurak; R Abrams; L Kleinberg; S Watkins; C J Yeo; K D Lillemoe; J V Sitzmann; W Sharfman
Journal:  Cancer J Sci Am       Date:  1997 May-Jun

5.  The role of multimodality therapy for resectable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J C Meneu-Diaz; L A Blazquez; E Vicente; J Nuño; Y Quijano; P Lopez-Hervás; M Devesa; V Fresneda
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for restaging esophageal carcinoma after chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Ishaan Kalha; Madhukar Kaw; Norio Fukami; Mihir Patel; Sandeep Singh; Harish Gagneja; Deborah Cohen; Jeffrey Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  M C Posner; W E Gooding; R J Landreneau; M M Rosenstein; M R Clarke; M S Peterson; B C Lembersky
Journal:  Cancer J Sci Am       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

8.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy followed by transhiatal esophagectomy for local-regional cancer of the esophagus.

Authors:  A A Forastiere; M B Orringer; C Perez-Tamayo; S G Urba; S Husted; B J Takasugi; M Zahurak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Multimodality treatment for esophageal cancer: the role of surgery and neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Martin A Makary; Paul D Kiernan; Michael J Sheridan; Glen Tonnesen; Vivian Hetrick; Betty Vaughan; Paula Graling; Eric Elster
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  [Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: pre-operative combined radiochemotherapy from a surgical oncological viewpoint].

Authors:  B L D M Brücher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Surgical indications and optimization of patients for resectable esophageal malignancies.

Authors:  Joshua C Grimm; Vicente Valero; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Methylated DAPK and APC promoter DNA detection in peripheral blood is significantly associated with apparent residual tumor and outcome.

Authors:  Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann; Daniel Vallböhmer; Klaus Prenzel; Ralf Metzger; Michaela Heitmann; Susanne Neiss; Fredericke Ling; Arnulf H Hölscher; Paul M Schneider; Jan Brabender
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  The Value of PET Imaging in Patients with Localized Gastroesophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Ken Herrmann; Bernd-Joachim Krause; Florian Lordick
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.