Literature DB >> 16648105

Voice quality assessment after laryngeal cancer radiotherapeutic treatment at initial stages.

M Jesús Caminero Cueva1, Blanca Señaris González, Aurora López Llames, Faustino Núñez Batalla, Ramón Alonso Pantiga, Carlos Suárez Nieto.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The voice quality resulting from the radiotherapeutic treatment is a relevant factor to take into consideration at the time of evaluating the results. In this study the results of an objective assessment in relation to the vocal function and the patients' voice self-evaluation are presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 18 glottic tumour patients, at initial stage, treated with radiotherapy, were studied. There were made an objective analysis on the voice and a study on the perceived quality both by the examiners and the patients.
RESULTS: Normal voices were observed in the 11%, slight dysphonias in 44.4%, moderate dysphonias in 27.8% and severe dysphonias in 16.7% of the cases. Spectrographically, the 18 samples were classified as Grade I one case (5.5%), Grade II 7 (38.8%), Grade III 5 (27.7%) and Grade IV 5 (27.7%). The questionnaire Voice Handicap Index which was completed by the patients themselves, gave out results values very close to normality.
CONCLUSIONS: the patients voice acoustic analysis of the series shows the damage thereof after the radiotherapeutic treatment is minimum as well as the handicap feeling of the T1 laryngeal carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16648105     DOI: 10.1007/BF02664940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  13 in total

1.  [Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: correlation with acoustic parameters and reliability].

Authors:  F Núñez Batalla; P Corte Santos; G Sequeiros Santiago; B Señaris González; C Suárez Nieto
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul

2.  Quality of life after treatment for early laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  S J Stoeckli; M Guidicelli; A Schneider; A Huber; S Schmid
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Voice quality after narrow-margin laser cordectomy compared with laryngeal irradiation.

Authors:  K G Delsupehe; I Zink; M Lejaegere; R W Bastian
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Vocal quality 10 years after radiotherapy for early glottic cancer.

Authors:  D A Morgan; H F Robinson; L Marsh; P J Bradley
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness.

Authors:  N Yanagihara
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-09

6.  A comparison of radiation-induced and presbylaryngeal dysphonia.

Authors:  A Behrman; A L Abramson; D Myssiorek
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Voice quality after radiation therapy for early glottic cancer.

Authors:  I Hocevar-Boltezar; M Zargi; I Honocodeevar-Boltezar
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-09

8.  Management and outcome of early glottic carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan C Smith; Jonas T Johnson; Eugene N Myers
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions.

Authors:  Alison Behrman; Lucian Sulica; Tina He
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Voice quality after laser surgery or radiotherapy for T1a glottic carcinoma.

Authors:  Etsuyo Tamura; Satoshi Kitahara; Masami Ogura; Naoyuki Kohno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

1.  Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation.

Authors:  Renata Jds Campos; Cristina Tv Maciel; Marcelle G Cesca; Isabel Cg Leite
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-04-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.