PURPOSE: To determine differences in size of cochlear nerves among subjects with deafness due to connexin 26 (Cx26) mutations, subjects with deafness of unknown origin, and normal hearing subjects by sagittal high-resolution magnetic resonance (HRMR) imaging of the temporal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and surface areas and volumetric measurements of the cochlear nerve and modiolus were made on HRMR images of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and inner ear in the 3 groups of children (groups 1, 2, and 3). Three-way comparisons of in vivo cochlear nerve measurements on HRMR imaging were made among 17 children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and no obvious etiology for the hearing loss (group 1), 7 children with profound SNHL due to a Cx26 mutation (group 2), and 10 normal hearing children (group 3). RESULTS: Children with profound SNHL of unknown cause and children with profound SNHL due to a connexin mutation displayed hypoplastic cochlear nerves as compared with normal controls. HRMR imaging of the temporal bone was accurately delineated potential problems with cochlear nerves in 2 of 17 instances where high-resolution computed tomography did not do so. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate and specific measurements of the cochlear nerve and related structures is possible on HRMR imaging of the temporal bone. The size of the cochlear nerve is mildly hypoplastic in children with profound SNHL of unknown causes or children with a deafness-causing Cx26 mutation. HRMR imaging is superior to high-resolution computed tomography in the investigation of profound SNHL in children.
PURPOSE: To determine differences in size of cochlear nerves among subjects with deafness due to connexin 26 (Cx26) mutations, subjects with deafness of unknown origin, and normal hearing subjects by sagittal high-resolution magnetic resonance (HRMR) imaging of the temporal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and surface areas and volumetric measurements of the cochlear nerve and modiolus were made on HRMR images of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and inner ear in the 3 groups of children (groups 1, 2, and 3). Three-way comparisons of in vivo cochlear nerve measurements on HRMR imaging were made among 17 children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and no obvious etiology for the hearing loss (group 1), 7 children with profound SNHL due to a Cx26 mutation (group 2), and 10 normal hearing children (group 3). RESULTS:Children with profound SNHL of unknown cause and children with profound SNHL due to a connexin mutation displayed hypoplastic cochlear nerves as compared with normal controls. HRMR imaging of the temporal bone was accurately delineated potential problems with cochlear nerves in 2 of 17 instances where high-resolution computed tomography did not do so. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate and specific measurements of the cochlear nerve and related structures is possible on HRMR imaging of the temporal bone. The size of the cochlear nerve is mildly hypoplastic in children with profound SNHL of unknown causes or children with a deafness-causing Cx26 mutation. HRMR imaging is superior to high-resolution computed tomography in the investigation of profound SNHL in children.
Authors: O Sildiroglu; H Cincik; G Sonmez; E Ozturk; H Mutlu; E Gocgeldi; A Tunca Keskin; C Basekim; E Kizilkaya Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2009-12-28 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Joseph P Roche; Benjamin Y Huang; Mauricio Castillo; Marc K Bassim; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Nagy N N Naguib; Constanze Hey; Mohamed S Shaaban; Amr M Elabd; Hebatallah H M Hassan; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Benjamin Kaltenbach; Marc Harth; Hanns Ackermann; Timo Stöver; Thomas J Vogl; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Margaret A Kenna; Heidi L Rehm; Anna Frangulov; Henry A Feldman; Caroline D Robson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Juyong Chung; Jeong Hun Jang; Sun O Chang; Jae-Jin Song; Sung-Woo Cho; So Young Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Seung-Ha Oh Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 3.411