Literature DB >> 16647504

Comparison between clinical and histopathological scoring in cadaveric kidney transplantation and its correlation with posttransplant evolution.

L Re1, F Cicora, J Petroni, J Goldberg, M C Rial, D Casadei.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are several scoring systems, both clinical (Deceased Donor Score [DDS]) and histopathological (Remuzzi [REM]), that attempt to determine acceptability criteria for deceased donor kidney transplant. A retrospective study was performed among a group of kidney transplant recipients to evaluate posttransplant evolution with clinical and histopathological scores.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 107 first deceased donor kidney transplant patients, 95 had undergone a pretransplant biopsy. Donor age was 38.46 +/- 16.9 years; recipient age: 49.2 +/- 16.3 years; DDS was 15.58 +/- 7.29. REM was 2.89 +/- 1.7. Delayed graft function was 64.2%. Induction therapy was administered to 49.5%. Cold ischemia time (CIT) was 1364 +/- 348 minute. Time on dialysis was 2275 +/- 1501 days. Induction therapy, immunosuppressive regimens, CIT, and time on dialysis were not significantly different among the groups. One-year patient and graft survival were 94.5% and 86%, respectively and 2-year values, 92.6% and 81%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: DDS showed a significant correlation with serum creatinine values over 1 and 2 years. REM did not show a significant association with any events. The differences were sustained after adjusting for other variables. Graft survival maintained a strong correlation with DDS categories and no association with REM. The clinical characteristics of a deceased donor appeared to be of greater importance than the biopsy findings in terms of posttransplant events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647504     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  3 in total

1.  The role of procurement biopsies in acceptance decisions for kidneys retrieved for transplant.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Darren E Stewart; Bipin R Bista; Nicholas Salkowski; Jon J Snyder; Ajay K Israni; Gretchen S Crary; John D Rosendale; Arthur J Matas; Francis L Delmonico
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Can only histological evaluation determine the allocation of ECD kidneys?

Authors:  Carlo Grifasi; Vincenzo D'Alessandro; Maria D'Armiento; Severo Campione; Alessandro Scotti; Luigi Pelosio; Andrea Renda
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Improved Normothermic Machine Perfusion After Short Oxygenated Hypothermic Machine Perfusion of Ischemically Injured Porcine Kidneys.

Authors:  Stina Lignell; Stine Lohmann; Kaithlyn M Rozenberg; Henri G D Leuvenink; Merel B F Pool; Kate R Lewis; Cyril Moers; James P Hunter; Rutger J Ploeg; Marco Eijken; Ulla Møldrup; Søren Krag; Carla C Baan; Bjarne Kuno Møller; Anna Krarup Keller; Bente Jespersen
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-01-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.