Literature DB >> 16647354

Early removal of postmastectomy drains is not beneficial: results from a halted randomized controlled trial.

Anise Barton1, Maurice Blitz, David Callahan, Walter Yakimets, David Adams, Kelly Dabbs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Closed-suction drainage to reduce seromas is standard after mastectomy. This study evaluates the safety of early drain removal.
METHODS: Women undergoing mastectomy were randomized to early removal on postoperative day 2 or standard removal (< 30 mL drainage in 24 hours or postoperative day 14). Primary endpoints were time to drain removal and physician visits. Secondary endpoints were number of seroma aspirations, drain reinsertions, and infections.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were recruited before an interim analysis was performed to address safety concerns. Three patients withdrew before trial completion, leaving 14 patients in the standard group and 10 in the early group. Patients in the standard group had significantly fewer seroma aspirations, fewer drain reinsertions, and fewer physician visits. The trial was halted because of the higher rate of events in the early group.
CONCLUSION: Surgical drains cannot be safely removed on postoperative day 2 after mastectomy. Early removal significantly increases the occurrence of seromas requiring treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647354     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  12 in total

Review 1.  Management of skin and subcutaneous tissue in complex open abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  I Khansa; J E Janis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  The volume and duration of wound drainage are independent prognostic factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Hua Gao; Wei Gao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-12-06

3.  Coordination of Care for Breast Reconstruction Patients: A Provider Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer L Milucky; Allison M Deal; Carey Anders; Rebecca Wu; Richard Sean McNally; Clara N Lee
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Is routine drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Yong-Jian Jiang; Ji Li; Feng Yang; Yang Di; Lie Yao; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Safety and feasibility of early postmastectomy discharge and home drain care in a low resource setting.

Authors:  Olalekan Olasehinde; Olusegun Alatise; Olukayode Arowolo; Adewale Adisa; Funmilola Wuraola; Carla Boutin-Foster; Oladejo Lawal; Thomas Kingham
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Conventional suture with prolonged timing of drainage is as good as quilting suture in preventing seroma formation at pectoral area after mastectomy.

Authors:  Juan Huang; Shouman Wang; Yuhui Wu; Jian Hai; Jie Mao; Xue Dong; Zhi Xiao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 7.  Drainage after Modified Radical Mastectomy - A Methodological Mini-Review.

Authors:  George S Stoyanov; Dragostina Tsocheva; Katerina Marinova; Emil Dobrev; Rumen Nenkov
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-10

8.  Improving the recording of surgical drain output.

Authors:  Nicholas Lyons; Paul Heron; Rob Bethune
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2015-09-04

9.  Dead space closure with quilting suture versus conventional closure with drainage for the prevention of seroma after mastectomy for breast cancer (QUISERMAS): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lobna Ouldamer; Julia Bonastre; Solène Brunet-Houdard; Gilles Body; Bruno Giraudeau; Agnès Caille
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Risk of infection is associated more with drain duration than daily drainage volume in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction: A cohort study.

Authors:  Cheng-Feng Chen; Shou-Fong Lin; Chen-Fang Hung; Pesus Chou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.