Literature DB >> 16647262

A biomechanical study comparing a raft of 3.5 mm cortical screws with 6.5 mm cancellous screws in depressed tibial plateau fractures.

Sunit Patil1, Andrew Mahon, Sarah Green, Ian McMurtry, Andrew Port.   

Abstract

There has been a recent trend towards using a raft of small diameter 3.5mm cortical screws for supporting depressed tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker type III). Our aim was to compare the biomechanical properties of a raft of 3.5 mm cortical screws with that of 6.5 mm cancellous screws in a synthetic bone model. Ten rigid polyurethane foam (sawbone) blocks, with a density simulating osteoporotic bone and ten blocks with a density simulating normal density bone were obtained. A Schatzker type III fracture was created in each block. The fracture fragments were then elevated and supported using two 6.5 mm cancellous screws in ten blocks and four 3.5 mm cortical screws in the remaining. The fractures were loaded using a Lloyd testing machine. The mean force needed to produce a depression of 5 mm was 700.8 N with the four-screw construct and 512.4 N with the two-screw construct in the osteoporotic model. This difference was highly statistically significant (p = 0.009). The mean force required to produce the same depression was 1878.2 N with the two-screw construct and 1938.2 N with the four-screw construct in the non-osteoporotic model. Though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42), an increased fragmentation of the synthetic bone fragments was noticed with the two-screw construct but not with the four-screw construct. A raft of four 3.5 mm cortical screws is biomechanically stronger than two 6.5 mm cancellous screws in resisting axial compression in osteoporotic bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647262     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Balloon osteoplasty--a new technique for reduction and stabilisation of impression fractures in the tibial plateau: a cadaver study and first clinical application.

Authors:  Philipp Ahrens; Gunther Sandmann; Jan Bauer; Benjamin König; Frank Martetschläger; Dirk Müller; Sebastian Siebenlist; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Markus Neumaier; Peter Biberthaler; Ulrich Stöckle; Thomas Freude
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bicondylar tibial fractures: Internal or external fixation?

Authors:  Gunasekaran Kumar; Nicholas Peterson; Badri Narayan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  A biomechanical study comparing two fixation methods in depression fractures of the lateral tibial plateau in porcine bone.

Authors:  Caroline M Blakey; Michael Rennison; Stephen P Guy; Paul M Sutton
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of interfragmentary compression at tibia plateau fractures in vitro using different fixation techniques: a CONSORT-compliant article.

Authors:  K Kojima; B Gueorguiev; G Seva; K Stoffel; R Garcia de Oliveira; U Eberli; T Nicolino; M Lenz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Subchondral raft construction with locking plates for the treatment of Schatzker type II fractures.

Authors:  Cemil Kayali; Caner Citak; Taskin Altay; Zafer Kement
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

6.  Newly designed anterolateral and posterolateral locking anatomic plates for lateral tibial plateau fractures: a finite element study.

Authors:  Pengbo Chen; Hua Lu; Hao Shen; Wei Wang; Binbin Ni; Jishizhan Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Plate osteosynthesis combined with bone cement provides the highest stability for tibial head depression fractures under high loading conditions.

Authors:  Philipp Heilig; Lars-Christopher Faerber; Mila M Paul; Eva Kupczyk; Rainer H Meffert; Martin C Jordan; Stefanie Hoelscher-Doht
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.