Literature DB >> 16647247

Acoustical correlates of affective prosody.

Kurt Hammerschmidt1, Uwe Jürgens.   

Abstract

The word "Anna" was spoken by 12 female and 11 male subjects with six different emotional expressions: "rage/hot anger," "despair/lamentation," "contempt/disgust," "joyful surprise," "voluptuous enjoyment/sensual satisfaction," and "affection/tenderness." In an acoustical analysis, 94 parameters were extracted from the speech samples and broken down by correlation analysis to 15 parameters entering subsequent statistical tests. The results show that each emotion can be characterized by a specific acoustic profile, differentiating that emotion significantly from all others. If aversive emotions are tested against hedonistic emotions as a group, it turns out that the best indicator of aversiveness is the ratio of peak frequency (frequency with the highest amplitude) to fundamental frequency, followed by the peak frequency, the percentage of time segments with nonharmonic structure ("noise"), frequency range within single time segments, and time of the maximum of the peak frequency within the utterance. Only the last parameter, however, codes aversiveness independent of the loudness of an utterance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647247     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  26 in total

1.  The role of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse communication.

Authors:  Christine V Portfors; David J Perkel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Perceptions of distress in young children with autism compared to typically developing children: a cultural comparison between Japan and Italy.

Authors:  G Esposito; J Nakazawa; P Venuti; M H Bornstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2012-02-22

3.  A Moan of Pleasure Should Be Breathy: The Effect of Voice Quality on the Meaning of Human Nonverbal Vocalizations.

Authors:  Andrey Anikin
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Neural decoding of discriminative auditory object features depends on their socio-affective valence.

Authors:  Sascha Frühholz; Wietske van der Zwaag; Melissa Saenz; Pascal Belin; Anne-Kathrin Schobert; Patrik Vuilleumier; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Authentic and play-acted vocal emotion expressions reveal acoustic differences.

Authors:  Rebecca Jürgens; Kurt Hammerschmidt; Julia Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-28

6.  On the time course of vocal emotion recognition.

Authors:  Marc D Pell; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Receptive prosody in nonfluent primary progressive aphasias.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; Disa Sauter; Sophie Scott; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Cross-taxa similarities in affect-induced changes of vocal behavior and voice in arboreal monkeys.

Authors:  Alban Lemasson; Kevin Remeuf; Arnaud Rossard; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How to engage the right brain hemisphere in aphasics without even singing: evidence for two paths of speech recovery.

Authors:  Benjamin Stahl; Ilona Henseler; Robert Turner; Stefan Geyer; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Encoding conditions affect recognition of vocally expressed emotions across cultures.

Authors:  Rebecca Jürgens; Matthis Drolet; Ralph Pirow; Elisabeth Scheiner; Julia Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.