Literature DB >> 16646873

Treating expression levels of different genes as a sample in microarray data analysis: is it worth a risk?

Lev Klebanov, Andrei Yakovlev.   

Abstract

One of the prevailing ideas in the literature on microarray data analysis is to pool the expression measures across genes and treat them as a sample drawn from some distribution. Several universal laws were proposed to analytically describe this distribution. This idea raises a number of concerns. The expression levels of genes are not identically distributed random variables so that treating them as a sample amounts to sampling from a mixture of equally weighted distributions, each being associated with a different gene. The expression levels of different genes are heavily dependent random variables so that the law of large numbers and statistical goodness-of-fit tests are normally inapplicable to this kind of data. This dependence represents a very serious pitfall in microarray data analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16646873     DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1544-6115


  9 in total

1.  Leveraging Big Data to Transform Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Benjamin S Glicksberg; Li Li; Rong Chen; Joel Dudley; Bin Chen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

2.  Characterization of a genomic signature of pregnancy identified in the breast.

Authors:  Ilana Belitskaya-Lévy; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Jose Russo; Irma H Russo; Pal Bordás; Janet Ahman; Yelena Afanasyeva; Robert Johansson; Per Lenner; Xiaochun Li; Ricardo López de Cicco; Suraj Peri; Eric Ross; Patricia A Russo; Julia Santucci-Pereira; Fathima S Sheriff; Michael Slifker; Göran Hallmans; Paolo Toniolo; Alan A Arslan
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-05-27

3.  A Distribution-Free Convolution Model for background correction of oligonucleotide microarray data.

Authors:  Zhongxue Chen; Monnie McGee; Qingzhong Liu; Megan Kong; Youping Deng; Richard H Scheuermann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Balancing Type One and Two Errors in Multiple Testing for Differential Expression of Genes.

Authors:  Alexander Gordon; Linlin Chen; Galina Glazko; Andrei Yakovlev
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 1.681

5.  False discovery rate paradigms for statistical analyses of microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng; Stan Pounds
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2007-04-10

6.  Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek; John D Storey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Is there an alternative to increasing the sample size in microarray studies?

Authors:  Lev Klebanov; Andrei Yakovlev
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2007-04-10

8.  How high is the level of technical noise in microarray data?

Authors:  Lev Klebanov; Andrei Yakovlev
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.540

9.  Weighted analysis of general microarray experiments.

Authors:  Anders Sjögren; Erik Kristiansson; Mats Rudemo; Olle Nerman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.