Literature DB >> 16646326

A comparison of two West Nile virus detection assays (TaqMan reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and VecTest antigen assay) during three consecutive outbreaks in northern Illinois.

Richard L Lampman1, Nina M Krasavin, Michael Szyska, Robert J Novak.   

Abstract

Mosquitoes identified as female Culex (Culex) species, primarily mixtures or uniform batches of Culex pipiens and Culex restuans, were collected daily from gravid traps by 2 mosquito abatement districts (MADs) in Cook County, Illinois. From 2002 through 2004, batches (pools) of mosquitoes were tested by the MADs for West Nile virus (WNV) by using VecTest WNV antigen assays and the same samples were retested, usually within 1-2 wk, for WNV RNA by the TaqMan reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). There were 952 TaqMan-positive pools out of 3,953 pools over the 3 years, and about one half of that number were VecTest-positive. The difference between the 2 detection assays varied between and within years. The VecTest assays detected about 57% and 69% of the TaqMan RT-PCR-positive pools from Des Plaines Valley MAD and Northwest MAD in 2002, but only about 40% and 46% in 2003, and 36% and 55% in 2004, respectively. Based on a subset of the 2004 data, a linear relationship was found between VecTest detection of WNV and TaqMan cycle threshold between 18 and 28 cycles. A temporal decrease in the difference between the 2 assays was observed in 2003 and 2004, which we conjecture is due, at least partially, to a seasonal decline in the proportion of recently infected mosquitoes. This trend was not observed in 2002 because infection rates indicated a high likelihood of more than 1 infected mosquito per pool at the peak of transmission. Unlike a previous study, the 95% confidence intervals of infection rates based on the 2 detection methods did not always overlap. The highest infection rates occurred in 2002 when mean monthly temperatures were above average.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16646326     DOI: 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[76:ACOTWN]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc        ISSN: 8756-971X            Impact factor:   0.917


  3 in total

1.  Fundamental issues in mosquito surveillance for arboviral transmission.

Authors:  Weidong Gu; Thomas R Unnasch; Charles R Katholi; Richard Lampman; Robert J Novak
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.184

2.  Effects of Detritus on the Mosquito Culex pipiens: Phragmites and Schedonorus (Festuca) Invasion Affect Population Performance.

Authors:  Paul T Leisnham; Brandon Scott; Andrew H Baldwin; Shannon L LaDeau
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Development of genus-specific universal primers for the detection of flaviviruses.

Authors:  Tomo Daidoji; Ronald Enrique Morales Vargas; Katsuro Hagiwara; Yasuha Arai; Yohei Watanabe; Keisuke Nishioka; Fumi Murakoshi; Kotaro Garan; Hiroki Sadakane; Takaaki Nakaya
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.099

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.