Literature DB >> 16646017

Development of an in vitro blood-brain barrier model to study the effects of endosulfan on the permeability of tight junctions and a comparative study of the cytotoxic effects of endosulfan on rat and human glial and neuronal cell cultures.

Melissa P L Chan1, Shinsuke Morisawa, Aki Nakayama, Yuko Kawamoto, Minoru Yoneda.   

Abstract

Endosulfan, an organochlorine (OC) insecticide that belongs to the cyclodiene group, is one of the most commonly used pesticides to control pests in vegetables, cotton, and fruits. Porcine brain microvascular endothelial cells were used to develop a model to study the effects of endosulfan on the permeability of tight junctions in the blood-brain barrier (BBB). BBB permeability, measured as transendothelial electrical resistance, decreased in a dose- and time-dependent manner when treated with alpha-endosulfan, beta-endosulfan, or endosulfan sulfate. Cytotoxicity testing revealed that the three endosulfans did not cause cell death at concentrations of 10 microM and below. The ratio of the average permeability of the filter-grown endothelial cell monolayer to 14C-endosulfan (Pe) going from the outer to the inner compartments with that going from the inner to the outer compartments was approximately 1:1.2-2.1 after exposure to concentrations of 0.01-10 microM. alpha-Endosulfan, beta-endosulfan, and endosulfan sulfate had cytotoxic effects on rat glial (C6) and neuronal (PC12) cell cultures as well as on human glial (CCF-STTG1) and neuronal (NT2) cell cultures. The effects of alpha-endosulfan were highly selective, with a wide range of LC50 values found in the different cultures, ranging from 11.2 microM for CCF-STTG1 cells to 48.0 microM for PC12 cells. In contrast, selective neurotoxicity was not so manifest in glial and neuronal cell cultures after exposure to endosulfan sulfate, as LC50 values were in the range of 10.4-21.6 microM. CCF-STTG1 cells were more sensitive to alpha-endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate, whereas NT2 cells were more sensitive to beta-endosulfan. Copyright 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16646017     DOI: 10.1002/tox.20175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol        ISSN: 1520-4081            Impact factor:   4.119


  7 in total

1.  Ameliorating effect of N-acetylcysteine and curcumin on pesticide-induced oxidative DNA damage in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Authors:  Tanzeel Ahmed; Rahul Pathak; M D Mustafa; Rajarshi Kar; Ashok K Tripathi; Rafat S Ahmed; B D Banerjee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Gene expression profiling to identify the toxicities and potentially relevant disease outcomes due to endosulfan exposure.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Shuai Li; Limei Lin; Fei Qi; Xiaoming Hang; Yeqing Sun
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  A microfluidic model of the blood-brain barrier to study permeabilization by pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  M Bonakdar; P M Graybill; R V Davalos
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Neurotoxicity of pesticides.

Authors:  Jason R Richardson; Vanessa Fitsanakis; Remco H S Westerink; Anumantha G Kanthasamy
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  Mechanistic Interplay Between Autophagy and Apoptotic Signaling in Endosulfan-Induced Dopaminergic Neurotoxicity: Relevance to the Adverse Outcome Pathway in Pesticide Neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Chunjuan Song; Adhithiya Charli; Jie Luo; Zainab Riaz; Huajun Jin; Vellareddy Anantharam; Arthi Kanthasamy; Anumantha G Kanthasamy
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Astrocytes and Microglia in Stress-Induced Neuroinflammation: The African Perspective.

Authors:  Matthew Ayokunle Olude; Abdeslam Mouihate; Oluwaseun Ahmed Mustapha; Cinthia Farina; Francisco Javier Quintana; James Olukayode Olopade
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 7.  Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Elise P W Jenkins; Alina Finch; Magda Gerigk; Iasonas F Triantis; Colin Watts; George G Malliaras
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 16.806

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.