BACKGROUND: Postinfarct remodeled myocardium exhibits numerous structural and biochemical alterations. So far, it is unknown whether postconditioning elicited by volatile anesthetics can also provide protection in the remodeled myocardium. METHODS: Myocardial infarct was induced in male Wistar rats by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Six weeks later, hearts were buffer-perfused and exposed to 40 min of ischemia followed by 90 min of reperfusion. Anesthetic postconditioning was induced by 15 min of 2.1 vol% isoflurane. In some experiments, LY294002 (15 microM), a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, was coadministered with isoflurane. Masson's trichrome staining, immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis, and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction served to confirm remodeling. In buffer-perfused hearts, functional recovery was recorded, and acute infarct size was measured using 1% triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and lactate dehydrogenase release during reperfusion. Western blot analysis was used to determine phosphorylation of reperfusion injury salvage kinases including protein kinase B/Akt and its downstream targets after 15 min of reperfusion. RESULTS: Infarct hearts exhibited typical macroscopic and molecular changes of remodeling. Isoflurane postconditioning improved functional recovery and decreased acute infarct size, as determined by triphenyltetrazolium (35 +/- 5% in unprotected hearts vs. 8 +/- 3% in anesthetic postconditioning; P < 0.05) and lactate dehydrogenase release. This protection was abolished by LY294002, which inhibited phosphorylation of protein kinase B/Akt and its downstream targets glycogen synthase kinase 3beta, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and p70S6 kinase. CONCLUSIONS: Infarct-remodeled myocardium is receptive to protection by isoflurane postconditioning via protein kinase B/Akt signaling. This is the first time to demonstrate that anesthetic postconditioning retains its marked protection in diseased myocardium.
BACKGROUND: Postinfarct remodeled myocardium exhibits numerous structural and biochemical alterations. So far, it is unknown whether postconditioning elicited by volatile anesthetics can also provide protection in the remodeled myocardium. METHODS:Myocardial infarct was induced in male Wistar rats by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Six weeks later, hearts were buffer-perfused and exposed to 40 min of ischemia followed by 90 min of reperfusion. Anesthetic postconditioning was induced by 15 min of 2.1 vol% isoflurane. In some experiments, LY294002 (15 microM), a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, was coadministered with isoflurane. Masson's trichrome staining, immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis, and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction served to confirm remodeling. In buffer-perfused hearts, functional recovery was recorded, and acute infarct size was measured using 1% triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and lactate dehydrogenase release during reperfusion. Western blot analysis was used to determine phosphorylation of reperfusion injury salvage kinases including protein kinase B/Akt and its downstream targets after 15 min of reperfusion. RESULTS:Infarct hearts exhibited typical macroscopic and molecular changes of remodeling. Isoflurane postconditioning improved functional recovery and decreased acute infarct size, as determined by triphenyltetrazolium (35 +/- 5% in unprotected hearts vs. 8 +/- 3% in anesthetic postconditioning; P < 0.05) and lactate dehydrogenase release. This protection was abolished by LY294002, which inhibited phosphorylation of protein kinase B/Akt and its downstream targets glycogen synthase kinase 3beta, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and p70S6 kinase. CONCLUSIONS:Infarct-remodeled myocardium is receptive to protection by isoflurane postconditioning via protein kinase B/Akt signaling. This is the first time to demonstrate that anesthetic postconditioning retains its marked protection in diseased myocardium.
Authors: Zhi-Dong Ge; Danijel Pravdic; Martin Bienengraeber; Phillip F Pratt; John A Auchampach; Garrett J Gross; Judy R Kersten; David C Warltier Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Antonio H Martins; Jing Hu; Zhenfeng Xu; Chaofeng Mu; Paloma Alvarez; Byron D Ford; Khalid El Sayed; Vesna A Eterovic; Pedro A Ferchmin; Jiukuan Hao Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Paul S Pagel; John G Krolikowski; Phillip F Pratt; Yon Hee Shim; Julien Amour; David C Warltier; Dorothee Weihrauch Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Paul S Pagel; John G Krolikowski; Phillip F Pratt; Yon Hee Shim; Julien Amour; David C Warltier; Dorothee Weihrauch Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Jürgen Knapp; Peter Teschendorf; Eberhard Scholz; Joachim Roewer; Nicolai Russ; Bernd W Böttiger; Erik Popp Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Yousuke T Horikawa; Hemal H Patel; Yasuo M Tsutsumi; Michelle M Jennings; Michael W Kidd; Yasuko Hagiwara; Yoshihiro Ishikawa; Paul A Insel; David M Roth Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 5.000