Literature DB >> 16644808

How should we rate research?

F D Richard Hobbs, Paul M Stewart.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16644808      PMCID： PMC1450030          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.332.7548.983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Academic medicine: a faltering engine.

Authors:  Paul M Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-23
  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  How should we rate research? Pedigree: paternity and progeny.

Authors:  Woody Caan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-20

2.  How should we rate research? Counting number of publications may be best research performance measure.

Authors:  Bruce G Charlton; Peter Andras
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-20

3.  The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Reena Sidhu; Praveen Rajashekhar; Victoria L Lavin; Joanne Parry; James Attwood; Anita Holdcroft; David S Sanders
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs.

Authors:  Liz Allen; Ceri Jones; Kevin Dolby; David Lynn; Mark Walport
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.