Literature DB >> 16644791

How accurately can we control the FDR in analyzing microarray data?

Sin-Ho Jung1, Woncheol Jang.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: We want to evaluate the performance of two FDR-based multiple testing procedures by Benjamini and Hochberg (1995, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57, 289-300) and Storey (2002, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 64, 479-498) in analyzing real microarray data. These procedures commonly require independence or weak dependence of the test statistics. However, expression levels of different genes from each array are usually correlated due to coexpressing genes and various sources of errors from experiment-specific and subject-specific conditions that are not adjusted for in data analysis. Because of high dimensionality of microarray data, it is usually impossible to check whether the weak dependence condition is met for a given dataset or not. We propose to generate a large number of test statistics from a simulation model which has asymptotically (in terms of the number of arrays) the same correlation structure as the test statistics that will be calculated from the given data and to investigate how accurately the FDR-based testing procedures control the FDR on the simulated data. Our approach is to directly check the performance of these procedures for a given dataset, rather than to check the weak dependency requirement. We illustrate the proposed method with real microarray datasets, one where the clinical endpoint is disease group and another where it is survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16644791     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  11 in total

Review 1.  Statistical considerations for analysis of microarray experiments.

Authors:  Kouros Owzar; William T Barry; Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Nonparametric methods for the analysis of single-color pathogen microarrays.

Authors:  Omar J Jabado; Sean Conlan; Phenix-Lan Quan; Jeffrey Hui; Gustavo Palacios; Mady Hornig; Thomas Briese; W Ian Lipkin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  A gene selection method for GeneChip array data with small sample sizes.

Authors:  Zhongxue Chen; Qingzhong Liu; Monnie McGee; Megan Kong; Xudong Huang; Youping Deng; Richard H Scheuermann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 4.  Statistical Issues in the Design and Analysis of nCounter Projects.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Insuk Sohn
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-12-14

5.  Using the Generalized Index of Dissimilarity to Detect Gene-Gene Interactions in Multi-Class Phenotypes.

Authors:  Jaeyong Yee; Yongkang Kim; Taesung Park; Mira Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Estimating the false discovery rate using mixed normal distribution for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Yasunori Sato; Takashi Sozu; Chikuma Hamada; Isao Yoshimura
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-01-22

7.  A modified entropy-based approach for identifying gene-gene interactions in case-control study.

Authors:  Jaeyong Yee; Min-Seok Kwon; Taesung Park; Mira Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genomic and functional studies of Drosophila sex hierarchy regulated gene expression in adult head and nervous system tissues.

Authors:  Thomas D Goldman; Michelle N Arbeitman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems.

Authors:  Kyung In Kim; Mark A van de Wiel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sample size calculation for microarray experiments with blocked one-way design.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Insuk Sohn; Stephen L George; Liping Feng; Phyllis C Leppert
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.