Literature DB >> 16644366

Virtual reality in ophthalmology training.

Yousuf M Khalifa1, David Bogorad, Vincent Gibson, John Peifer, Julian Nussbaum.   

Abstract

Current training models are limited by an unstructured curriculum, financial costs, human costs, and time constraints. With the newly mandated resident surgical competency, training programs are struggling to find viable methods of assessing and documenting the surgical skills of trainees. Virtual-reality technologies have been used for decades in flight simulation to train and assess competency, and there has been a recent push in surgical specialties to incorporate virtual-reality simulation into residency programs. These efforts have culminated in an FDA-approved carotid stenting simulator. What role virtual reality will play in the evolution of ophthalmology surgical curriculum is uncertain. The current apprentice system has served the art of surgery for over 100 years, and we foresee virtual reality working synergistically with our current curriculum modalities to streamline and enhance the resident's learning experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16644366     DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  23 in total

1.  Impact of a month-long training program on the clinical skills of ophthalmology residents and practitioners.

Authors:  Sushma Tejwani; Somasheila I Murthy; Chandra Sekhar Gadudadri; Ravi Thomas; Praveen Nirmalan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  A survey of the role of virtual surgery simulators in ophthalmic graduate medical education.

Authors:  Yasir Ahmed; Ingrid U Scott; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Establishing construct validity of a virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy via a multimetric scoring system.

Authors:  Michael Bajka; Stefan Tuchschmid; Daniel Fink; Gábor Székely; Matthias Harders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Is virtual reality training for resident cataract surgeons cost effective?

Authors:  Benjamin K Young; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Validation of a virtual reality-based simulator for shoulder arthroscopy.

Authors:  Stefan Rahm; Marco Germann; Andreas Hingsammer; Karl Wieser; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Application of virtual reality technology in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Lan Li; Fei Yu; Dongquan Shi; Jianping Shi; Zongjun Tian; Jiquan Yang; Xingsong Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Development of a vibration haptic simulator for shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan R Kusins; Jason A Strelzow; Marie-Eve LeBel; Louis M Ferreira
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Virtual reality training improves wet-lab performance of capsulorhexis: results of a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Feudner; Corinna Engel; Irmingard M Neuhann; Katrin Petermeier; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Evaluation of a virtual-reality-based simulator using passive haptic feedback for knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Sandro F Fucentese; Stefan Rahm; Karl Wieser; Jonas Spillmann; Matthias Harders; Peter P Koch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  The potential impact of 5G telecommunication technology on ophthalmology.

Authors:  Gurfarmaan Singh; Robert Casson; WengOnn Chan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.