Literature DB >> 16644313

Missed opportunities in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction: an assessment of the effects of statin underprescribing on mortality.

Peter C Austin1, Muhammad M Mamdani, David N Juurlink, David A Alter, Jack V Tu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of statins for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease are well established. Previous research indicates that patients at the greatest risk of cardiovascular events are the least likely to receive statins. We explored the potential reduction in mortality at the population level that could result from improving statin prescribing among patients least likely to be prescribed a statin after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
METHODS: Simulation analysis of detailed clinical data for a population-based sample of 7285 AMI survivors discharged from 102 hospitals between April 1, 1999, and March 31, 2001 in Ontario, Canada, was done. Using estimates obtained from randomized controlled trials, we estimated the reduction in 3-year all-cause mortality associated with improved statin prescribing at hospital discharge.
RESULTS: Overall, 35.6% of patients received a statin prescription at hospital discharge. We estimate that increasing statin prescribing among patients least likely to receive them (ie, the lowest quintile of propensity to receive a prescription at discharge) from the current rate of 7.8% to the rate among all patients (35.6%) could decrease AMI mortality by 83 deaths in Ontario per year (2.1% of all post-AMI deaths within 3 years of discharge). Increasing statin prescribing to 70% among all patients with AMI could avert 312 deaths per year in Ontario. Factoring in low rates of adherence to statin therapy would reduce these estimates to 33 and 126, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Modest increases in statin prescribing for patients least likely to receive one could decrease post-AMI mortality at the population level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16644313     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  14 in total

1.  Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in older adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jerome L Fleg; Daniel E Forman; Kathy Berra; Vera Bittner; James A Blumenthal; Michael A Chen; Susan Cheng; Dalane W Kitzman; Mathew S Maurer; Michael W Rich; Win-Kuang Shen; Mark A Williams; Susan J Zieman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Statin-prescribing trends for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Felicity Brown; Alexander Singer; Alan Katz; Gerald Konrad
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Association Between Preadmission Functional Status and Use and Effectiveness of Secondary Prevention Medications in Elderly Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Kathleen M Schneider; Mary C Schroeder; Elena Letuchy; Robert B Wallace; Jennifer G Robinson; John M Brooks
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Achieving cholesterol targets by individualizing starting doses of statin according to baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary artery disease risk category: the CANadians Achieve Cholesterol Targets Fast with Atorvastatin Stratified Titration (CanACTFAST) study.

Authors:  Ehud Ur; Anatoly Langer; Simon W Rabkin; Cristina-Dana Calciu; Lawrence A Leiter
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Computerized history-taking as a tool to manage dyslipidemia.

Authors:  David Zakim; Christine Fritz; Niko Braun; Peter Fritz; M Dominik Alscher
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-11-12

7.  How many cardiovascular events can be prevented with optimal management of high-risk Canadians?

Authors:  Daniel T Grima; Lawrence A Leiter; Shaun G Goodman; Cheryl L Attard; Chi-Ming Chow; Anatoly Langer
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David A Asch; Andrea B Troxel; Walter F Stewart; Thomas D Sequist; James B Jones; AnneMarie G Hirsch; Karen Hoffer; Jingsan Zhu; Wenli Wang; Amanda Hodlofski; Antonette B Frasch; Mark G Weiner; Darra D Finnerty; Meredith B Rosenthal; Kelsey Gangemi; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Community-based interventions to improve outcomes for cardiovascular disease [letter].

Authors:  Marta A Miyares; Kyle A Davis
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.