Literature DB >> 16644272

Predictability of the target stimulus for sensory-guided movement modulates early somatosensory cortical potentials.

Wynn Legon1, W Richard Staines.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of sensory modulation in the control of sensory-guided behaviour. Specifically, we hypothesized that early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) would be facilitated during performance of continuous sensory-guided movement requiring sustained attention.
METHODS: Median nerve SEPs were elicited via electrical stimulation and recorded from scalp electrodes while subjects performed tasks requiring continuous sensory-motor transformations. Subjects received a predictable (rhythmic amplitude modulation) or unpredictable (random amplitude modulation) amplitude varying tactile stimulus (frequency constant at 20 Hz) delivered to the tip of the index finger either alone or with the requirement to track it by modulating the isometric grip force produced by the opposite hand.
RESULTS: Early SEP (N20-P27) amplitudes were differentially modulated during unpredictable tracking compared to sensory-motor controls. Specifically, N20 amplitudes were attenuated and P27 amplitudes were enhanced during sensory-guided tracking.
CONCLUSIONS: Sustained attention to task-relevant sensory stimuli differentially modulates areas within primary somatosensory cortex (S1) during a continuous sensory-motor transformation. SIGNIFICANCE: These data have implications for understanding the role of attention in regulating somatosensory cortices during sensory-motor behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16644272     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  7 in total

1.  Modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during force generation and relaxation.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Attention modulates specific motor cortical circuits recruited by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J L Mirdamadi; L Y Suzuki; S K Meehan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  The origin, and application of somatosensory evoked potentials as a neurophysiological technique to investigate neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Steven R Passmore; Bernadette Murphy; Timothy D Lee
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

4.  Differential force scaling of fine-graded power grip force in the sensorimotor network.

Authors:  Birgit Keisker; Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond; Armin Blickenstorfer; Martin Meyer; Spyros S Kollias
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Non-dominant hand movement facilitates the frontal N30 somatosensory evoked potential.

Authors:  Wynn Legon; Jennifer K Dionne; Sean K Meehan; W Richard Staines
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Facilitation of information processing in the primary somatosensory area in the ball rotation task.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High-frequency peripheral vibration decreases completion time on a number of motor tasks.

Authors:  Antonella Macerollo; Clare Palmer; Thomas Foltynie; Prasad Korlipara; Patricia Limousin; Mark Edwards; James M Kilner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.386

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.