Literature DB >> 1664415

MHC class II restricted recognition of FMDV peptides by bovine T cells.

E J Glass1, R A Oliver, T Collen, T R Doel, R Dimarchi, R L Spooner.   

Abstract

A putative synthetic vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease (FMDV15) has proved less successful in a host species, cattle, than predicted by results in a small-animal model. Possible reasons for this include non-recognition by T cells influenced by major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-linked immune response gene control. It is now possible to type for human leucocyte antigen (HLA) DR-like bovine MHC (BoLA) class II polymorphisms with a one-dimensional isoelectric focusing (IEF) technique. Using this method 14 unrelated cattle were selected with eight different BoLA class II IEF types. After immunization with FMDV15, 13 cattle generated a T-cell response to FMDV15. However, the fine specificity and magnitude of the response was related to BoLA class II type. The non-response by one animal and low response by two other animals were associated with two of the BoLA class II types. Response to the region 149-158 was immunodominant and animals which did not respond to this region had low responses to the whole peptide. Using FMDV-specific T-cell lines five BoLA class II types associated with responder animals were able to present FMDV15 in an MHC class II-restricted fashion, indicating that this peptide is capable of binding to different MHC class II molecules and may account for the broad response observed. The restriction patterns of the lines indicated that the IEF method does not distinguish all functional polymorphisms. At least two of the IEF-defined types could each be split into two distinct specificities and revealed that the three sets of animals with identical IEF types in fact expressed distinct restriction elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1664415      PMCID: PMC1384766     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  30 in total

1.  A T cell epitope in VP1 of foot-and-mouth disease virus is immunodominant for vaccinated cattle.

Authors:  T Collen; R Dimarchi; T R Doel
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Protection of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease by a synthetic peptide.

Authors:  R DiMarchi; G Brooke; C Gale; V Cracknell; T Doel; N Mowat
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Universally immunogenic T cell epitopes: promiscuous binding to human MHC class II and promiscuous recognition by T cells.

Authors:  P Panina-Bordignon; A Tan; A Termijtelen; S Demotz; G Corradin; A Lanzavecchia
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Immune response to uncoupled peptides of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  M J Francis; C M Fry; D J Rowlands; J L Bittle; R A Houghten; R A Lerner; F Brown
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  The molecular context of determinants within the priming antigen establishes a hierarchy of T cell induction: T cell specificities induced by peptides of beta-galactosidase vs. the whole antigen.

Authors:  S Shivakumar; E E Sercarz; U Krzych
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Genomic hybridization of bovine class II major histocompatibility genes: 1. Extensive polymorphism of DQ alpha and DQ beta genes.

Authors:  L Andersson; J Böhme; L Rask; P A Peterson
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  A high proportion of anti-peptide antibodies recognize foot-and-mouth disease virus particles.

Authors:  N R Parry; A Syred; D J Rowlands; F Brown
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  Bovine T cells recognize antigen in association with MHC class II haplotypes defined by one-dimensional isoelectric focusing.

Authors:  E J Glass; R A Oliver; R L Spooner
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  The cell attachment site on foot-and-mouth disease virus includes the amino acid sequence RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid).

Authors:  G Fox; N R Parry; P V Barnett; B McGinn; D J Rowlands; F Brown
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.891

10.  Joint report of the Third International Bovine Lymphocyte Antigen (BoLA) Workshop, Helsinki, Finland, 27 July 1986.

Authors:  R W Bull; H A Lewin; M C Wu; K Peterbaugh; D Antczak; D Bernoco; S Cwik; L Dam; C Davies; R L Dawkins
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Marvin J Grubman; Barry Baxt
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  A large-scale evaluation of peptide vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease: lack of solid protection in cattle and isolation of escape mutants.

Authors:  O Taboga; C Tami; E Carrillo; J I Núñez; A Rodríguez; J C Saíz; E Blanco; M L Valero; X Roig; J A Camarero; D Andreu; M G Mateu; E Giralt; E Domingo; F Sobrino; E L Palma
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Co-expression of the Bcl-xL antiapoptotic protein enhances the induction of Th1-like immune responses in mice immunized with DNA vaccines encoding FMDV B and T cell epitopes.

Authors:  Sultan Gülçe İz; Mert Döşkaya; Belen Borrego; Fernando Rodriguez; Yüksel Gürüz; Ismet Deliloğlu Gürhan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Induction of a cross-reactive CD8(+) T cell response following foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccination.

Authors:  Efrain Guzman; Geraldine Taylor; Bryan Charleston; Shirley A Ellis
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Functional expression of a cattle MHC class II DR-like antigen on mouse L cells.

Authors:  D C Fraser; S Craigmile; J D Campbell; R A Oliver; D J Brown; G C Russell; R L Spooner; E J Glass
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 6.  Need for cellular and humoral immune responses in bovines to ensure protection from foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV)--a point of view.

Authors:  Y Becker
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.332

7.  Induction of effective cross-reactive immunity by FMDV peptides is critically dependent upon specific MHC-peptide-T cell interactions.

Authors:  E J Glass; P Millar
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  Sequences derived from the highly antigenic VP1 region 140 to 160 of foot-and-mouth disease virus do not prime for a bovine T-cell response against intact virus.

Authors:  M J van Lierop; J P Wagenaar; J M van Noort; E J Hensen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  The influence of MHC polymorphism on the selection of T-cell determinants of FMDV in cattle.

Authors:  M J Van Lierop; P R Nilsson; J P Wagenaar; J M Van Noort; J D Campbell; E J Glass; I Joosten; E J Hensen
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  CD4+ T-cell responses to foot-and-mouth disease virus in vaccinated cattle.

Authors:  B Veronica Carr; Eric A Lefevre; Miriam A Windsor; Cristina Inghese; Simon Gubbins; Helen Prentice; Nicholas D Juleff; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.