OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the utility of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (HS) in a sample of terminally ill cancer patients by examining the scale properties. Moreover, we sought to identify and remove potentially problematic items in order to ascertain a "purer" index of hopelessness for this population. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of 200 hospice inpatients with a life expectancy of less than 6 months. The HS, as well as several other distress measures, were administered to patients at bedside by trained clinicians. METHODS: An item analysis of the HS was conducted, looking specifically at item endorsement and item-total correlations. Three abbreviated versions (3-item 7-item, 13-item) were developed based on certain denoted item-total correlation cut-offs. Reliability and validity of the original 20-item HS was then compared to that of the newly developed abbreviated version. RESULTS: All scales were found to be reliable and valid measures of hopelessness. The three abbreviated versions were more highly correlated with the distress measures than the original version, and the 7-item and 13-item subscales outperformed the original HS in the prediction of suicidal ideation and desire for hastened death. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the HS may be improved, when applied to a terminally ill sample, by the elimination of problematic items. The development of a shorter, purer measure of hopelessness for this population is crucial given the need to reduce the burden placed on those who participate in end-of-life studies, and the important role of hopelessness in the prediction of suicide and desire for hastened death.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the utility of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (HS) in a sample of terminally ill cancerpatients by examining the scale properties. Moreover, we sought to identify and remove potentially problematic items in order to ascertain a "purer" index of hopelessness for this population. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of 200 hospice inpatients with a life expectancy of less than 6 months. The HS, as well as several other distress measures, were administered to patients at bedside by trained clinicians. METHODS: An item analysis of the HS was conducted, looking specifically at item endorsement and item-total correlations. Three abbreviated versions (3-item 7-item, 13-item) were developed based on certain denoted item-total correlation cut-offs. Reliability and validity of the original 20-item HS was then compared to that of the newly developed abbreviated version. RESULTS: All scales were found to be reliable and valid measures of hopelessness. The three abbreviated versions were more highly correlated with the distress measures than the original version, and the 7-item and 13-item subscales outperformed the original HS in the prediction of suicidal ideation and desire for hastened death. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the HS may be improved, when applied to a terminally ill sample, by the elimination of problematic items. The development of a shorter, purer measure of hopelessness for this population is crucial given the need to reduce the burden placed on those who participate in end-of-life studies, and the important role of hopelessness in the prediction of suicide and desire for hastened death.
Authors: Barry Rosenfeld; Hayley Pessin; Charles Lewis; Jennifer Abbey; Megan Olden; Emily Sachs; Lia Amakawa; Elissa Kolva; Robert Brescia; William Breitbart Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2011-06
Authors: Christian J Nelson; Christina Cho; Alexandra R Berk; Jimmie Holland; Andrew J Roth Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maurizio Pompili; Gianluca Serafini; Marco Innamorati; Franco Montebovi; Dorian A Lamis; Mariantonietta Milelli; Manuela Giuliani; Matteo Caporro; Paolo Tisei; David Lester; Mario Amore; Paolo Girardi; Carla Buttinelli Journal: World J Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-22
Authors: Rosanna Cousins; Hikari Ando; Everard Thornton; Biswajit Chakrabarti; Robert Angus; Carolyn Young Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2013-11-01