Literature DB >> 16643618

Robotic urological surgery in patients with prior abdominal operations is not associated with increased complications.

Tanya Nazemi1, Anton Galich, Lynette Smith, K C Balaji.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The da Vinci Surgical Robotic System is being increasingly used to perform complex urological operations by minimally invasive techniques. Prior abdominal surgery associated with intra-abdominal adhesions may complicate robotic surgery.
METHODS: We used a cohort of consecutive 49 patients undergoing a variety of robotic urological procedures at our institution to study the impact of prior abdominal operations on early perioperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 21/49 (43%) patients (Group A) had no history of prior abdominal surgery and the rest 28/49 (57%; Group B) had undergone prior abdominal surgery. The incidence of peritoneal adhesions was significantly higher in patients with prior abdominal surgery compared to the rest of the cohort, 54% versus 10% (P=0.002). The median operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative drop in hemoglobin, time to hospital discharge, postoperative narcotic analgesic use and postoperative complication rate between group A and group B were not statistically different. The overall perioperative complication rate for the entire cohort was 14.3%, with 6-8% of complications occurring in each of the two groups (P=1.0). Comparative subset analysis of 28 patients in Group B, 15 (54%) and 13 (46%) with or without intra-abdominal adhesions did not reveal a significant difference in perioperative complication rates either. However, operative time was longer in patients with intra-abdominal adhesions compared to patients without, median of 590 (281-922) and 434 (153-723) min respectively, although not statistically significant (P=0.059).
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that robotic urological surgery can be performed in patients with prior abdominal surgery without increased perioperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16643618     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01273.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  5 in total

1.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Feasibility of planned mini-laparotomy and adhesiolysis at the time of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with prior major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Emad Rajih; Naif Alhathal; Abdullah M Alenizi; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.

Authors:  Christine Benmessaoud; Hadi Kharrazi; Karl F MacDorman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Bertram E Yuh; Joseph Ciccone; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Zubair M Butt; Gregory E Wilding; Hyung L Kim; James L Mohler; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Does previous abdominal surgery adversely affect perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Xiaosong Wei; Jinjin Lu; Khurram Mutahir Siddiqui; Fan Li; Qianyuan Zhuang; Weimin Yang; Zhiquan Hu; Zhong Chen; Xiaodong Song; Shaogang Wang; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.