Literature DB >> 16643444

Impact of two independent bone marrow samples on minimal residual disease monitoring in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Vincent H J van der Velden1, Patricia G Hoogeveen, Rob Pieters, Jacques J M van Dongen.   

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) diagnostics are used for risk group stratification in several acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treatment protocols. It is, however, unclear whether MRD is homogeneously distributed within the bone marrow (BM) and whether this affects MRD diagnostics. We, therefore, analysed MRD levels in 141 paired BM samples (two independent punctures at different locations) from 26 ALL patients by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. MRD levels were comparable in 112 paired samples (79%), whereas two samples (both taken at day 15) had MRD levels that differed more than threefold. In the remaining 27 paired samples, MRD could be quantified or detected in one sample only. In four patients, MRD-based risk group classification was dependent on the site of BM puncture. Repetition of MRD analyses using 10-fold replicates instead of triplicates resolved most differences. In conclusion, MRD levels in paired BM samples were highly comparable, indicating that it is sufficient to analyse MRD in a single sample only. Nevertheless, MRD-based risk group classification can differ between paired BM samples, mainly because of variation below the quantitative range of the PCR assay rather than to a different distribution of leukaemic cells within the BM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16643444     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06056.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  6 in total

Review 1.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Sensitive and specific measurement of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Alexander A Morley; Sue Latham; Michael J Brisco; Pamela J Sykes; Rosemary Sutton; Elizabeth Hughes; Vicki Wilczek; Bradley Budgen; Katrina van Zanten; Bryone J Kuss; Nicola C Venn; Murray D Norris; Catherine Crock; Colin Storey; Tamas Revesz; Keith Waters
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 3.  Flow Cytometric Minimal Residual Disease Analysis in Acute Leukemia: Current Status.

Authors:  Pulkit Rastogi; Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 4.  Methods of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in childhood haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Justyna Jółkowska; Katarzyna Derwich; Małgorzata Dawidowska
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.653

5.  Sources of error in measurement of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Sue Latham; Elizabeth Hughes; Bradley Budgen; Francoise Mechinaud; Catherine Crock; Henry Ekert; Peter Campbell; Alexander Morley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Antigen receptor sequencing of paired bone marrow samples shows homogeneous distribution of acute lymphoblastic leukemia subclones.

Authors:  Prisca M J Theunissen; David van Zessen; Andrew P Stubbs; Malek Faham; Christian M Zwaan; Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J Van Der Velden
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 9.941

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.