Literature DB >> 16641417

In vitro evaluation of stent patency and in-stent stenoses in 10 metallic stents using MR angiography.

O W Hamer1, I Borisch, C Paetzel, W R Nitz, J Seitz, S Feuerbach, N Zorger.   

Abstract

In vitro study to investigate the suitability of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) for determination of stent patency and grading of in-stent stenoses in 10 metallic stents. The Acculink carotid, DynaLink, Easy Wallstent, JostentSelfX XF, Luminexx, Omnilink, sinus-SuperFlex, SMART, Symphony and ZA stent were separately placed in a vascular phantom. Dedicated stenoses inside the stents generated a concentric lumen narrowing of 50%. CEMRA was performed for each stent. Signal loss inside the stents and artificial lumen narrowing were assessed objectively using the evaluation software of the MR imager. Moreover, three blinded observers determined visibility of stent patency and in-stent stenoses subjectively on a 3-point scale and graded in-stent stenoses. Loss of signal intensity within the stent lumen ranged between 90% (Wallstent) and 5% (ZA), artificial lumen narrowing between 56% (Symphony) and 22% (ZA). For the Symphony and Wallstent, visibility of patency and in-stent stenoses was impaired and the observers' grading exaggerated the degree of stenoses (by 23% and 33%, respectively). For the remainder of stents, patency and stenoses were visible and stenoses were graded accurately (less than 10% discrepancy from reference standard). In this in vitro study, eight of 10 stents presented with MRI characteristics which enabled determination of stent patency and accurate grading of clinically relevant in-stent stenoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16641417     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/57301879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

1.  Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas M J Frölich; Sara M Pilgram-Pastor; Marios N Psychogios; Alexander Mohr; Michael Knauth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Accuracy of multislice CT angiography for the assessment of in-stent restenoses in the iliac arteries at reduced dose: a phantom study.

Authors:  K Perisinakis; E Manousaki; K Zourari; D Tsetis; A Tzedakis; A Papadakis; A Karantanas; J Damilakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  An overview on the advances in cardiovascular interventional MR imaging.

Authors:  Olaf Saborowski; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Artificial luminal narrowing on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiograms on an occasion of stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysm: in vitro comparison using two different stents with variable imaging parameters.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Seok; Hyun Seok Choi; So-Lyung Jung; Kook-Jin Ahn; Myeong Jin Kim; Yong Sam Shin; Bum-soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Dual-Source CT Angiography of Peripheral Arterial Stents: In Vitro Evaluation of 22 Different Stent Types.

Authors:  Michael Köhler; Matthias C Burg; Alexander C Bunck; Walter Heindel; Harald Seifarth; David Maintz
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-18

Review 6.  MR fluoroscopy in vascular and cardiac interventions (review).

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Steve W Hetts; Joey English; Mark Wilson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  (In)comparability of Carotid Artery Stent Characteristics: A Systematic Review on Assessment and Comparison with Manufacturer Data.

Authors:  Evelien E de Vries; Mert Kök; Astrid M Hoving; Cornelis H Slump; Raechel J Toorop; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.740

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.