Literature DB >> 1663965

Lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension? A Norwegian multicenter study on efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in 828 patients.

I Os1, B Bratland, B Dahløf, K Gisholt, J O Syvertsen, S Tretli.   

Abstract

In a randomized, parallel, double-blind study, lisinopril (n = 412; average dose 18.8 mg) reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (change = 20.2/13.8 mmHg; P less than 0.01/P less than 0.01) more than nifedipine (n = 416; average dose 37.4 mg; change = 13.3/11.2 mmHg) after 10-week treatment in patients, aged 40-70 years, with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Lisinopril was better tolerated than nifedipine. The withdrawals from treatment were fewer in the lisinopril-treated group (11 versus 46; P less than 0.01). The frequency of adverse experiences reported after a general question of discomfort was significantly lower for lisinopril than for nifedipine (P less than 0.01). When questioned on specific symptoms, frequency of coughing was higher with lisinopril (P less than 0.01), while flushing, edema, palpitations, dizziness, tiredness and rash were reported more frequently (P less than 0.01, for all) in the nifedipine-treated group. Quality of life was assessed by both patients and spouses. No significant changes in wellbeing were observed for either drug, except for the highest dose level of nifedipine which caused a deterioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1663965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  9 in total

Review 1.  Quality-of-life instruments in hypertension.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  The effects of ACE inhibitors on cognitive function.

Authors:  A A O'Brien; C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Quality of life is not negatively affected by diet and exercise intervention in healthy men with cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  M L Hellénius; C Dahlöf; H Aberg; I Krakau; U de Faire
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Quality of life claims in trials of anti-hypertensive therapy.

Authors:  S M Hunt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  A comparison of lisinopril and nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. A multicentre study.

Authors:  B Rogstad
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  ACE inhibitors. Differential use in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Z H Israili; W D Hall
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Hypertension and non-insulin-dependent diabetes. A comparison between an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist.

Authors:  G Crepaldi; A Carraro; E Brocco; L Adezati; D Andreani; G Bompiani; P Brunetti; D Fedele; R Giorgino; G Giustina
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 8.  Individualised selection of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  L H Opie
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Zofenopril and incidence of cough: a review of published and unpublished data.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Claudio Borghi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.423

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.