Literature DB >> 1663858

Interpreting changes in quality-of-life score in N of 1 randomized trials.

R Jaeschke1, G H Guyatt, J Keller, J Singer.   

Abstract

To provide additional evidence regarding the plausible range of the differences in health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire scores within which the minimal important difference (MID) falls, we reviewed the results of 32 randomized controlled trials in individual subjects (N of 1 RCTs) with chronic diseases. These trials had been conducted to establish whether a patient was obtaining more good than harm from a medication. Each N of 1 RCT included a series of pairs of treatment periods, one period on active drug, and one on placebo or alternative drug. We examined the relationship between small (MID), medium, and large differences between periods within pairs, as indicated by Global Ratings and differences between these same periods according to HRQL questionnaires. The results showed a mean difference of 0.29 points per question in HRQL questionnaire scores corresponded to the MID. Differences of approximately 0.66 points per question corresponded to a moderate difference as ranked by the Global Rating; difference of about 1.09 points per question represented marked difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1663858     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(05)80026-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  12 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life as an outcome variable in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Pablo Martinez-Martin; Mónica M Kurtis
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.570

2.  Do clinical marker states improve responsiveness and construct validity of the standard gamble and feeling thermometer: a randomized multi-center trial in patients with chronic respiratory disease.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Roger Goldstein; M Jeffery Mador; Douglas McKim; Elisabeth Stahl; Lauren E Griffith; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Peggy Austin; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Approaches and methodological as well as interpretative issues in quality of life research in malaysia.

Authors:  C I Hasanah
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2003-07

Review 4.  Quality of life instruments in the evaluation of new drugs.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D Cook
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic respiratory insufficiency. 7. Health-related quality of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  J R Curtis; R A Deyo; L D Hudson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Comparison of distribution- and anchor-based approaches to infer changes in health-related quality of life of prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ravishankar Jayadevappa; Stanley Bruce Malkowicz; Marsha Wittink; Alan J Wein; Sumedha Chhatre
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Health-related quality of life in emphysema.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan; Andrew L Ries
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life in clinical trials that evaluate the role of chemotherapy in cancer treatment.

Authors:  M Michael; I F Tannock
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-30       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Exploration of the methods of establishing the minimum clinical important difference based on anchor and its application in the quality of life measurement scale QLICP-ES (V2.0) for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Dandan Ren; Ting Wu; Chonghua Wan; Gaofeng Li; Yanbo Qi; Yujing Fang; Jiudi Zhong
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  A nurse- and peer-led support program to assist women in gynaecological oncology receiving curative radiotherapy, the PeNTAGOn study (peer and nurse support trial to assist women in gynaecological oncology): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Penelope Schofield; Ilona Juraskova; Rebecca Bergin; Karla Gough; Linda Mileshkin; Meinir Krishnasamy; Kate White; David Bernshaw; Sylvia Penberthy; Sanchia Aranda
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.