Literature DB >> 16638254

Assessing blood pressure control in patients treated for hypertension: comparing different measurements and targets.

Gillian Manning1, Andrew Brooks, Barbara Slinn, Michael W Millar-Craig, Richard Donnelly.   

Abstract

We examined how different methods and definitions of blood pressure affect the achievement of targets in general practice. There was a wide range in the proportion of treated patients achieving the different target levels recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, British Hypertension Society and the general medical services contract. Among non-diabetic patients this ranged from; 10-37% (average office), 15-39% (standardised nurse measurement), 11-49% (last recorded) and 31-56% (ambulatory blood pressure). Defining targets without a clear definition of how blood pressure should be measured is largely meaningless and ignoring ambulatory blood pressure results in many patients being classified incorrectly as failing to achieve targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16638254      PMCID: PMC1837847     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  5 in total

1.  Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension.

Authors:  Denis L Clement; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk A De Bacquer; Peter W de Leeuw; Daniel A Duprez; Robert H Fagard; Peter J Gheeraert; Luc H Missault; Jacob J Braun; Roland O Six; Patricia Van Der Niepen; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  L Ramsay; B Williams; G Johnston; G MacGregor; L Poston; J Potter; N Poulter; G Russell
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV.

Authors:  B Williams; N R Poulter; M J Brown; M Davis; G T McInnes; J F Potter; P S Sever; S McG Thom
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Is ambulatory blood pressure monitoring cost-effective in the routine surveillance of treated hypertensive patients in primary care?

Authors:  Paula Lorgelly; Ilias Siatis; Andrew Brooks; Barbara Slinn; Michael W Millar-Craig; Richard Donnelly; Gillian Manning
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Paul Little; Jane Barnett; Lucy Barnsley; Jean Marjoram; Alex Fitzgerald-Barron; David Mant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-03
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Under pressure.

Authors:  George I Varughese; Abd A Tahrani
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.386

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.