Literature DB >> 16638013

Density effects on life-history traits in a wild population of the great tit Parus major: analyses of long-term data with GIS techniques.

Teddy A Wilkin1, Dany Garant, Andrew G Gosler, Ben C Sheldon.   

Abstract

1. Population density often has strong effects on the population dynamics and reproductive processes of territorial animals. However, most estimates of density-dependent effects use the number of breeding pairs per unit area in a given season and look for correlations across seasons, a technique that assigns the same density score to each breeding pair, irrespective of local spatial variation. 2. In this study, we employed GIS techniques to estimate individual breeding densities for great tits breeding in Wytham Woods UK, between 1965 and 1996. We then used linear mixed modelling to analyse the effect of density on reproductive processes. 3. The areas of Thiessen polygons formed around occupied nestboxes were used to approximate territory size (necessarily inverse of breeding density). There were significant, independent and positive relationships between clutch size, fledging mass and the number of offspring recruited to the population, and territory size (all P < 0.001), but no effect of territory size on lay-date or egg mass. 4. Thiessen polygons are contiguous and cover all of the available area. Therefore, at low nest densities territory polygons were excessively oversized. Using a novel procedure to address this limitation, territory sizes were systematically capped through a range of maxima, with the greatest effect in the models when territories were capped at 0.9-2.3 ha. This figure approximates to the maximum effective territory size in our population and is in close agreement with several field-based studies. This capping refinement also revealed a significant negative relationship between lay-date and territory size capped at 0.9 ha (P < 0.001). 5. These density-dependent effects were also detected when analyses were restricted to changes within individual females, suggesting that density effects do not merely result from either increased proportions of low-quality individuals, or increased occupation of poor sites, when population density is high. 6. Overall, these results suggest that, in the current population, great tits with territories smaller than c. 2 ha independently lay smaller and later clutches, have lighter fledglings, and recruit fewer offspring to the breeding population. These analyses thus suggest a pervasive and causal role of local population density in explaining individual reproductive processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16638013     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01078.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  22 in total

1.  Long-term familiarity promotes joining in neighbour nest defence.

Authors:  A M Grabowska-Zhang; B C Sheldon; C A Hinde
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Does food supplementation really enhance productivity of breeding birds?

Authors:  Timothy J E Harrison; Jennifer A Smith; Graham R Martin; Dan E Chamberlain; Stuart Bearhop; Gillian N Robb; S James Reynolds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Opposing effects on glutathione and reactive oxygen metabolites of sex, habitat, and spring date, but no effect of increased breeding density in great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Caroline Isaksson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Breeding phenology, provisioning behaviour, and unusual patterns of life history variation across an anthropogenic heterogeneous landscape.

Authors:  William O'Shea; John O'Halloran; John L Quinn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Environmental and genetic determinants of innovativeness in a natural population of birds.

Authors:  John L Quinn; Ella F Cole; Thomas E Reed; Julie Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  What can cross-cultural correlations teach us about human nature?

Authors:  Thomas V Pollet; Joshua M Tybur; Willem E Frankenhuis; Ian J Rickard
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-09

7.  Recent Shift in Climate Relationship Enables Prediction of the Timing of Bird Breeding.

Authors:  Shelley A Hinsley; Paul E Bellamy; Ross A Hill; Peter N Ferns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dispersal as a means of inbreeding avoidance in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Marta Szulkin; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Calcium effects on life-history traits in a wild population of the great tit (Parus major): analysis of long-term data at several spatial scales.

Authors:  Teddy Albert Wilkin; Andrew G Gosler; Dany Garant; S James Reynolds; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Is spatial autocorrelation an intrinsic property of territory size?

Authors:  Mihai Valcu; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.