BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Effects of advances in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) women's health care on women veterans' health care decision making are unknown. Our objective was to determine why women veterans use or do not use VA health care. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional survey of 2,174 women veteran VA users and VA-eligible nonusers throughout southern California and southern Nevada. MEASUREMENTS: VA utilization, attitudes toward care, and socio-demographics. RESULTS: Reasons cited for VA use included affordability (67.9%); women's health clinic (WHC) availability (58.8%); quality of care (54.8%); and convenience (47.9%). Reasons for choosing health care in non-VA settings included having insurance (71.0%); greater convenience of non-VA care (66.9%); lack of knowledge of VA eligibility and services (48.5%); and perceived better non-VA quality (34.5%). After adjustment for socio-demographics, health characteristics, and VA priority group, knowledge deficits about VA eligibility and services and perceived worse VA care quality predicted outside health care use. VA users were less likely than non-VA users to have after-hours access to nonemergency care, but more likely to receive both general and gender-related care from the same clinic or provider, to use a WHC for gender-related care, and to consider WHC availability very important. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of information about VA, perceptions of VA quality, and inconvenience of VA care, are deterrents to VA use for many women veterans. VA WHCs may foster VA use. Educational campaigns are needed to fill the knowledge gap regarding women veterans' VA eligibility and advances in VA quality of care, while VA managers consider solutions to after-hours access barriers.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Effects of advances in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) women's health care on women veterans' health care decision making are unknown. Our objective was to determine why women veterans use or do not use VA health care. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional survey of 2,174 women veteran VA users and VA-eligible nonusers throughout southern California and southern Nevada. MEASUREMENTS: VA utilization, attitudes toward care, and socio-demographics. RESULTS: Reasons cited for VA use included affordability (67.9%); women's health clinic (WHC) availability (58.8%); quality of care (54.8%); and convenience (47.9%). Reasons for choosing health care in non-VA settings included having insurance (71.0%); greater convenience of non-VA care (66.9%); lack of knowledge of VA eligibility and services (48.5%); and perceived better non-VA quality (34.5%). After adjustment for socio-demographics, health characteristics, and VA priority group, knowledge deficits about VA eligibility and services and perceived worse VA care quality predicted outside health care use. VA users were less likely than non-VA users to have after-hours access to nonemergency care, but more likely to receive both general and gender-related care from the same clinic or provider, to use a WHC for gender-related care, and to consider WHC availability very important. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of information about VA, perceptions of VA quality, and inconvenience of VA care, are deterrents to VA use for many women veterans. VA WHCs may foster VA use. Educational campaigns are needed to fill the knowledge gap regarding women veterans' VA eligibility and advances in VA quality of care, while VA managers consider solutions to after-hours access barriers.
Authors: Donna L Washington; Nancy D Harada; Valentine M Villa; JoAnn Damron-Rodriguez; Shawkat Dhanani; Herb Shon; Takashi Makinodan Journal: Mil Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: B Josea Kramer; Stella Jouldjian; Mingming Wang; Jeff Dang; Michael N Mitchell; Bruce Finke; Debra Saliba Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Donna L Washington; Valentine Villa; Arleen Brown; JoAnn Damron-Rodriguez; Nancy Harada Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-10-27 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Wei Duan-Porter; Brian C Martinson; Nancy Greer; Brent C Taylor; Kristen Ullman; Lauren McKenzie; Christina Rosebush; Roderick MacDonald; Samuel Falde; Timothy J Wilt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sarah A Friedman; Susan M Frayne; Eric Berg; Alison B Hamilton; Donna L Washington; Fay Saechao; Natalya C Maisel; Julia Y Lin; Katherine J Hoggatt; Ciaran S Phibbs Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Elizabeth M Yano; Maria K Mor; Nichole K Bayliss; Xiangyan Xu; Michael J Fine Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Patricia Hayes; Steven Wright; Paula P Schnurr; Linda Lipson; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Donna L Washington Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.128